(What’s Left of) Our Economy: U.S. Manufacturing Employment Hits a Downdraft

Tags

aircraft, aircraft engine parts, aircraft engines, aircraft parts, appliances, automotive, chemicals, electrical components, electrical equipment, Employment, fabricated metal product, furniture, Jobs, machinery, manufacturing, NFP, non-farm payrolls, pharmaceuticals, primary metals, private sector, semiconductors, surgical equipment, transportation equipment, vaccines, {What's Left of) Our Economy

The manufacturing jobs results contained in last Friday’s official monthly U.S. employment report were downbeat both because 2,000 positions were shed between April and May, and because that makes two months of losses out of the last three. Domestic industry hasn’t experienced a stretch that bad since the period from late 2019 through the depth of the devastating but brief CCP Virus-induced economy-wide nosedive.

And to add insult to injury, revisions were negative. April’s initially reported gain of 11,000 was downgraded to one of 10,000, and March’s losses were revised down a second time – from 8,000 to 12,00 – the worst monthly read since the 42,000 collapse of April, 2021.

In fact, these collective setbacks pushed manufacturing still deeper into post-pandemic employment laggard status. Since February, 2020 – the last full data month before the CCP Virus pandemic began hammering and distorting the entire economy – manufacturing headcounts have risen by 1.56 percent – less than the 1.61 percent calculable from last month’s release.

During the same period, non-farm payrolls (NFP – the U.S. government’s definition of the national jobs universe) have risen by 2.45 percent – an improvement over the 2.10 percent calculable last month. And private sector headcounts are up by 3.04 percent – an improvement over the 2.78 percent calculable last month.

It’s no surprise then that manufacturing’s share of American employment keeps shrinking. As of the new jobs report, it stood at 8.32 percent of NFP – lower than the 8.35 percent calculable last month and 8.39 percent just before the CCP Virus arrived state-side in force. And it represented 9.73 percent of private sector employment – lower than the 9.76 percent calculable last month and the 9.87 percent calculable in February, 2020.

May’s biggest jobs winners among the broadest manufacturing sub-sectors tracked by Washington were highly concentrated in a handful of industries:

>in the big, diverse transportation equipment sector, 10,500 positions were added sequentially, and April’s initially reported 6,700 advance was upgraded to one of 10,600. In all, transportation equipment companies have now registered four straight months of strong job creation, and their employment levels are now 4.78 percent greater than in immediately pre-pandemic-y February, 2020 versus the 3.81 percent calculable last month;

>electrical equipment, appliance and components, where a sequential jobs boost of 2,100 snapped a two-month losing streak and represented these companies’ best such performance since March, 2022’s increase of 3,000. Consequently, job levels in this sector have now advanced by 2.04 percent during the CCP Virus era and its aftermath, versus the 0.98 percent improvement calculable last month.

>primary metal manufacturing, whose 2,000 employment increase marked a fourth straight month of gains. The monthly rise was also the biggest for these companies since they hired 1,200 net new workers last October. Primary metal manufacturers’ payrolls have now moved to within 2.50 percent of their February, 2020 level, versus the 2.98 shortfall calculable last month; and

>the large chemicals industry, which improved employment by 1,700, and pushed its pandemic-era-plus headcount growth to 7.52 percent, versus the 7.49 percent calculable last month.

May’s losers among these broad were broad-based, with the biggest being:

>furniture and related products, where a jobs retreat of 4,000 was its worst such performance since last November’s 4,200 reduction. Because of this drop, the sector’s workforce is now 5.29 percent smaller than in immediately pre-pandemic-y February, 2020, versus the 3.70 percent calculable last month;

>machinery, whose 2,400 jobs fall-off was its worst such performance since the 6,500 cratering in November, 2021. This decrease, plus some negative revisions,  depressed this diverse sector’s headcount down to 0.95 percent above its February, 2020 level, versus the 1.24 percent increase calculable last month.

This poor machinery performance matters because the widespread use of its products for expansion and modernization make it an important barometer of the health both of the rest of industry and of the entire economy; and

>fabricated metal product manufacturing, another large sector which cut 2,300 positions. Whereas these companies’ headcounts had pulled to within 0.94 percent of their level just before the CCP Virus’ arrival, they’re now back to 1.21 percent below.

In addition to machinery, RealityChek has tracked another industry consistently since the virus began destabilizing the U.S. economy: automotive, whose its fortunes have so often and so heavily influenced determined those of manufacturing as a whole during the pandemic period.

As suggested by the robust hiring performance of the transportation equipment sector, April was a return to this pattern, with vehicle and parts makers bolstering payrolls by 6,800. In addition, April’s initially reported hiring increase of 5,800 was revised all the way up to 9,000 – the best such performance since last December’s 9,500 burst.

This recent surge has pushed automotive employment 8.42 percent higher than in February, 2020, versus the 7.18 percent calculable last month.

RealityChek has also been monitoring several narrower sectors that have attracted special attention during the CCP Virus era, but where the data are always a month behind those of the above broader sectors, Their April employment performances were generally mixed.

Despite the U.S. government’s decision to provide major subsidies to foster more semiconductor manufacturing in America, the sector’s employment record in April continued a weak spell that began back in January. The April loss of 800 jobs in the semiconductors and related devices category represented the sector’s fourth straight monthly decline, and March’s initially reported 300 increase is now judged to have been a steep drop of 1,700.

These dismal results – no doubt due at least partly to the return of glut conditions in many types of microchips – dragged down these companies’ employment gains to 8.86 percent above immediate pre-pandemic levels, versus the 9.20 percent improvement calculable last month.

Aircraft manufacturers shed jobs for the second straight month in April, with the 1,300 fall the worst monthly performance since May, 2021’s slide of 4,100. Along with mixed revisions, the April tumble meant that the aircraft workforce is now 3.62 percent smaller than just before the CCP Virus’ arrival in force versus the 3.29 percent calculable last month.

Hiring by aircraft engines and engine parts-makers in April dipped for the first time in three months, as these industries cut headcount by 300. The decline however, was only the first since July, 2021 and it followed a March jump of 1,000 that stayed unrevised. So employment by these companies slipped further below its February, 2020 levels, but just to 6.66 percent versus the 6.33 percent calculable last month.

By contrast, in non-engine aircraft parts, the workforce expanded for the fifth straight month – the longest period of growth since the months between January and June, 2019. The gain of 400 was also noteworthy because it followed a March increase that was upgraded from 600 to one of 800. Jobs in non-engine aircraft parts maker climbed to within 14.10 percent of their immediate pre-pandemic total, versus the 14.62 percent shortfall calculable last month.

But jobs totals for surgical appliances- and supplies-makers dipped by 500 in April. And the initially reported March flatline result for companies that turned out many of the products used to fight the virus is now judged to have been a shrinkage of 200. So where as of last month, these workforces were pegged at 1.23 percent larger than their February, 2020 levels, this growth has now been pared back to 0.57 percent.

The pharmaceuticals and medicines sector fared much better hiring-wise, with its 1,500 net new jobs its best such performance since January’s 1,700. This improvement, plus positive revisions, brought employment in this sector 15.09 percent higher during the CCP Virus era and its continuing aftermath versus the 14.54 percent increase calculable last month.

And the pharmaceutical sub-sector that contains vaccines added 800 jobs for its best employment month since last June and its increase of 900. The workforce for these vital health security companies is now 20.61 percent larger than in February, 2020, just before the CCP Virus’ arrival in force, versus the 19.80 percent calculable last month.

To be sure, domestic manufacturing data has a habit of producing pleasant surprises. (See, e.g., the latest production figures.) But with the overall economy continuing to lose momentum, and the foreign markets that normally buy so many domestically manufactured products performing no better, any near-term improvement in U.S. manufacturing employment will be just that – a pleasant surprise.    

Advertisement

(What’s Left of) Our Economy: The Latest Upside Surprise for U.S. Manufacturing

Tags

aircraft, aircraft parts, apparel, automotive, computer and electronics products, Federal Reserve, furniture, inflation, inflation-adjusted output, machinery, manufacturing, medical equipment, miscellaneous durable goods, pharmaceuticals, plastics and rubber products, primary metals, recession, {What's Left of) Our Economy

Sorry for the tardiness of this post on the latest official (April) figures for U.S. manufacturing output. Sometimes life gets in the way. But I hope you agree that they’re still worth reviewing because even without a stupendous performance by the automotive sector, they’d have still been solid.  And the more so with domestic-based industry and the entire economy either supposedly headed for recession or already in one.

These results don’t change the recent big-picture description of U.S.-based manufacturing production essentially flat-lining. But it hasn’t experienced a significant drop-off, either.

In fact, the April sequential growth of 1.02 percent in inflation-adjusted terms (what’s measured by these data tracked by the Federal Reserve and what will be used in this post unless otherwise specified) was the strongest since January’s 1.59 percent. And revisions were slightly positive.

And leaving aside the vehicle and parts sectors, April’s increase would have been a highly respectable 0.38 percent.

The April report shows that American manufacturers have now boosted their output by 1.20 percent since February, 2020, just before the state-side arrival in force of the CCP Virus pandemic As of last month, this figure was 0.93 percent.

The biggest April production winners among the broadest industry-specific manufacturing categories monitored by the Fed were:

>automotive, whose blazing 9.30 percent expansion not only was its best since October, 2021’s 10.44 percent but enabled the industry to achieve a new all-time production record. It topped December, 2018’s previous historic high by 1.89 percent.

Automotive output figures, though, can be volatile. Indeed, the strong April advance followed a downwardly revised March tumble of 1.93 percent that was the sector’s worst monthly performance since February, 2022’s 3.37 percent dive. So it’s still far from clear whether April represents a blip or the start of a lengthy upswing.

What is clear that, pending revisions, the April monthly jump pushed automotive production to 1.57 percent above its immediate pre-pandemic level, versus the 0.97 percent calculable last month;

>computer and electronics products, whose 2.15 percent April gain broke a weak spell of four months and stands as the sector’s best performance since its 2.62 percent advance in May, 2021. These industries have now grown by 1.57 percent since immediately pre-pandemic-y February, 2020, versus the 0.97 percent increase calculable last month. This rate seems modest, but computer and electronics products fell off only modestly during the deep CCP Virus-induced economy-wide downturn;

>plastics and rubber products, where production expanded by 1.16 percent in April for the sector’s second straight improvement after a long spell of weakness. In fact, the April results for plastics and rubber products makers was their strongest since February, 2022’s 2.67 percent. But due to some major downward revisions, these industries’ output sank from 0.37 percent below pre-pandemic levels to 2.01 percent below.;

>primary metals, which boosted production by 0.90 percent. But these industries have still shrunk by 2.71 percent during the pandemic era and it aftermath, versus the 2.90 percent calculable last month.

The biggest losers among these broad sectors were:

>miscellaneous durable goods, where output in April tumbled by 1.32 percent in the worst performance by this diverse group of industries since last December’s 1.79 decrease. Miscellaneous durable goods producers have still increased their production by 9.59 percent since February, 2020, but last month, growth during this period was 11.30 percent;

>apparel and leather goods, where production was cut by 0.80 percent, and post-February, 2020 growth was nearly halved – from the 9.12 percent calculable last month to 5.25 percent. Nonetheless, despite this progress, because of decades of penny-wage foreign competition, these sectors remained mere shadows of themselves:

>machinery, whose output decreased by 0.50 percent and extended a three-month losing streak. These results are discouraging because this diverse grouping is a bellwether for the rest of manufacturing and the economy overall, since its products are so widely used for expansion and modernization. Machinery’s poor recent performance has dragged its CCP Virus-era-and-beyond growth from the 5.85 percent calculable last month to 3.54 percent; and

>furniture and related products, whose -0.43 percent April output slip was its sixth retreat in the last seven months. These industries are now 12.43 percent smaller than in just before the CCP Virus’ arrival, versus the 11.49 percent calculable last month.

Manufacturing sectors of special importance since the pandemic began depressing and distorting the economy followed a solid March with a comparably good April.

The global semiconductor sector shortage that began during the virus period has now eased dramatically for most types of chips, and in that vein, it’s no surprise that U.S.-based producers increased output in April for the third straight month. The 2.08 percent improvement pushed the sector’s production 10.54 percent higher since February, 2020, versus the 8.05 percent calculable last month.

April production of pharmaceuticals and medicines – including vaccines – was strong, too, with the 1.06 percent rise representing the best performance since last December’s 1.08 percent. This sector is now 14.57 percent larger than in immediately pre-pandemic-y February, 2020, versus the 13.38 percent calculable last month.

Aircraft and aircraft parts companies boosted their production only fractionally in April, but this marginal gain broke a string of four straight decreases. Even so, a substantial downward March revision helped reduce these firms’ output growth since the pandemic’s arrival state side in force to 7.07 percent, versus the 7.87 percent calculable last month.

The only April loser among this group was the medical equipment and supplies industry. It’s 1.03 percent production drop was the worst since last December’s 1.57 percent, and dragged its virus-era-and-beyond growth from the 14.52 percent calculable last month to 13.02 percent.

With a U.S. recession still a prediction rather than a fact, the economy continuing to show at least decent momentum, and a growing likelihood that the Federal Reserve will pause its campaign of combating inflation with growth-slowing interest rate hikes, it’s difficult to be gloomy about domestic manufacturing’s near-term future. And if the nation’s politicians succumb to their usual election-year temptation to throw more money at businesses and consumers, then industry’s medium-term prospects look pretty good, too.

Of course, if that’s so, it means that inflation will stay high as well. And how long both developments will remain tolerable for businesses, consumers and all the consumers who vote, and the Fed with its inflation-fighting responsibilities, is anyone’s guess.

(What’s Left of) Our Economy: New Official Data Show U.S. Manufacturing Spinning its Wheels

Tags

aerospace, aircraft, aircraft parts, apparel, appliances, automotive, CCP Virus, coronavirus, COVID 19, electrical components, electrical equipment, Federal Reserve, industrial production, inflation-adjusted output, machinery, manufacturing, medical devices, medicines, miscellaneous transportation equipment, non-metallic mineral products, paper, petroleum and coal products, pharmaceuticals, plastics and rubber products, real growth, recession, semiconductors, stimulus, wood products, {What's Left of) Our Economy

Including some long-term “benchmark” revisions issued late last month, today’s Federal Reserve figures show that U.S. manufacturing output after inflation fell sequentially in March for the first time in three months.

The drop followed upgraded results for January and February, but even with those latest longer term revisions, the more important takeaway is that as of March now, price-adjusted manufacturing production (the measure used by the Fed, and the one that will be used in this release unless specified otherwise) was virtually unchanged over the past year.

And since February, 2020, just before the state-side arrival in force of the CCP Virus pandemic, industry has now grown by just 0.93 percent. Last month’s pre-benchmark Fed report pegged this increase at 1.65 percent.

For some longer term perspective, the new Fed statistics tell us that since peaking way back in December, 2007, American manufacturing production is down 5.98 percent. As of the last pre-benchmark release, this shrinkage was 5.30 percent. So domestic industry’s decade-and-half-plus slump has been slightly worse than previously estimated.

Back to the most recent numbers, only eight of the twenty biggest individual industry sectors tracked by the Fed expanded production on month in March. The biggest winners were:

>the very small apparel and leather goods industries, where production jumped sequentially in March by 1.96 percent. Although hammered and greatly diminished by decades of penny-wage foreign competition, output by these companies is now up 9.12 percent since just before America’s pandemic era began, versus the 8.02 percent calculable last month;

>petroleum and coal products, whose output expanded in March for a fourth straight month, and whose by 1.29 percent advance was the strongest since the 2.34 percent surge last September. Petroleum and coal products production is now 3.88 percent off its immediate pre-pandemic level, versus being 1.41 percent higher as of last month’s Fed release;

>paper manufacturing, which grew by 0.78 percent in March for its best monthly gain since November’s 1.64 percent increase. Since February, 2020, this sector has contracted by 6.33 percent – a big decrease but much better than the 13.69 percent plunge calculable last month;

>aerospace and miscellaneous transportation, where the March increase of 0.73 percent was the fist gain since last August. Production is now 6.84 percent higher than immediately prior to the pandemic’s state-side arrival in force, much lower than the 23.06 percent gain calculable last month; and

>plastics and rubber products, where production also improved by 0.73 percent in the sector’s best advance since February, 2022’s 2.67 percent burst. These sectors’ output moved to within 0.37 percent of it immediate pre-pandemic level, much closer than the 5.62 percent shortfall calculable last month.

The biggest losers of these big sectors were:

>wood products, which saw output plunge by 2.90 percent in March. And that wasn’t even its worst recent setback – that dubious honor goes to December’s 3.18 percent drop. These dismal results dragge wood products production down to 5.46 percent below its February, 2020 level, versus the 2.49 percent calculable last month;

>non-metallic mineral product, where production decreased for the first time in four months. But the 2.56 percent sequential retreat was the sector’s worst since the 4.01 percent crater in winter-affected 2021. Thanks to the rest of the benchmark revision, though, output of non-metallic mineral products is now actually up by 6.95 percent post-CCP Virus, versus the 2.67 percent calculable last month;

>electrical equipment, appliance, and component, a 1.71 percent production loser in its weakest monthly performance since November’s 2.83 percent tumble. Output in this diverse sector slipped to being up just 0.56 percent since immediately pre-pandemic-y February, 2020 versus the 4.32 gain calculable last month; and

>automotive, whose fortunes have been central to those of domestic manufacturing overall during these last challenging years. Its 1.48 percent March production drop was the greatest since last November as well (2.09 percent). This setbacks plus other benchmark revisions have pushed output of vehicles and parts down to 5.14 percent below February, 2020 levels. As of last month’s Fed release, they were 0.12 higher.

Output drooped in another manufacturing sector of unusual importance – machinery. Its products are used widely throughout the rest of industry and the economy that its production performance suggests whether the American corporate sector overall has decided to expand and modernize or whether its views the future more pessimistically.

Machinery’s March output dip of 0.68 percent, therefore, could be a negative indicator. At the same time, the decline was the first in three months – so maybe it’s a hiccup. Machinery production has now grown by 5.85 percet since the CCP Virus’ arrival in force state-side, slightly better than the 5.54 percent calculable last month.

Although President Biden has just declared the pandemic to be officially over, manufacturing sectors of special importance during this period fared well in March.

The global semiconductor industry that was plagued by shortages for so long now seems to be in full glut mode – except for the auto sector, whose chip supply reportedly is still spotty. Domestic output climbed 0.55 percent in March for its second straight monthly improvement. Slated to receive tens of billions of dollars worth of production subsidies from Washington going forward, semiconductor manufacturers have now raised their virus-era production by 8.05 percent since February, 2020 – a startling turnabout from the 7.83 percent decrease calculable last month.

Despite the pandemic’s steady fade over the last year, companies in medical equipment and supplies kept increasing production, and March’s advance of 0.43 percent was the third straight month of increases. Since the start of the pandemic era, their output has risen by 14.59 percent, versus the 10.52 percent calculable last month.

Production in pharmaceuticals and medicines – including vaccines – gained another 0.38 percent in March. Nonetheless, due to those benchmark revisions, its output is now estimated to be 13.38 percent greater than just before the pandemic’s arrival, down considerably from the 20.42 percent increase calculable last month.

Aircraft and aircraft parts companies kept benefiting from the post-pandemic rebound in travel, and turned out 0.35 percent more products in March than in February. But again, revisions resulted in a startling downgrade in post-February output figures – from the 30.19 percent increase calculable last month to just 7.87 percent.

What to expect going forward for manufacturing output?  As discussed for the entire economy in my latest post on consumer inflation, gloomy for the short-term (as signs of an impending slowdown and even recession mount) but brighter longer term (mainly because politicians won’t be able to resist the temptation to keep voters happy by propping up their purchasing power – which should create more demand for manufactured goods, too).    

(What’s Left of) Our Economy: U.S. Manufacturing Starts a Jobs Losing Streak

Tags

aircraft, aircraft engines, aircraft parts, automotive, banking crisis, Boeing, CCP Virus, chemicals, coronavirus, COVID 19, credit, Employment, fabricated metal products, food manufacturing, Jobs, machinery, manufacturing, metals, non-farm jobs, non-metallic mineral products, pharmaceuticals, plastics and rubber products, private sector, recession, semiconductors, soft landing, stimulus, surgical equipment, transportation equipment, vaccines, {What's Left of) Our Economy

U.S. manufacturing employment achieved a bad type of milestone in March, according to the official jobs data released today: Reflecting weakness in domestic industry, for the first time since the peak pandemic period of early spring, 2020, job levels fell for the second straight month.

The sequential decline was small – just 1,000. And the February dip was actually revised up from one of 4,000 to one of 1,000. But back-to-back losses of any kind haven’t been recorded since the CCP Virus began decimating the U.S. economy in March and April of 2020. Moreover, January’s modest monthly gain was downgraded a second time – from 13,000 to 11,000.

Because of these losses, and continuing economy-wide jobs gains, the March results worsened manufacturing’s status as an employment laggard since the pandemic’s arrival in force. Its payrolls have now risen by just 1.55 percent since February, 2020 – the last data month before the virus’ full economic effects began to be felt. That’s the same as the growth calculable from the previous jobs report.

For non-farm jobs overall (the federal government’s definition of the U.S. jobs universe), employment now stands 2.10 percent higher than in February, 2020, versus the 1.96 percent calculable from last month’s jobs report. And private sector employment is now up 2.71 percent during this period, versus the 2.46 percent calculable last month.

From another perspective, manufacturing jobs have dropped to 8.35 percent of total non-farm jobs – below the 8.36 percent calculable from last month’s release and the 8.39 percent level just before the CCP Virus’ arrival state-side in force. And they now account for just 9.76 percent of all private sector jobs, versus the 9.77 percent calculable from last month’s release and the immediate pre-pandemic share of 9.87 percent.

March’s biggest jobs winners among the broadest manufacturing sub-sectors tracked by Washington were:

>transportation equipment, a big, diverse grouping that added 6,400 positions. Moreover, this advance followed an upwardly revised 2,500 increase for February. Transportation equipment payrolls are now up 3.33 percent since immediately pre-pandemic-y February, 2020, versus the 2.82 percent calculable from last month’s jobs report;

>machinery, another broad category whose 3,800 employment monthly growth was encouraging because its products are used to equip and modernize nearly all manufacturing and non-manufacturing sectors. So changes in its workforce can signal optimism or pessimism about their prospects. In addition, this headcount expansion was the tenth in a row,and the March advance was the biggest since November’s 5,800 .

February’s initially reported 400 employment bump was revised down to 200, but machinery’s workforce is now 1.55 percent larger than in February, 2020, versus the 1.13 percent calculable last month;.

>food manufacturing, another big industry that added 3,400 workers and saw its initially reported 1,100 February employment drop revised up to a 1,400 improvement. Food manufacturing’s payrolls are now 4.52 percent greater than just prior to the pandemic’s arrival, versus the 4.26 percent calculable last month; and

>primary metal, a smallish sector that boosted employment by 1,800 in its best performance since last July’s 1,900. Just as good: It’s initially reported jobs cuts of 400 in February are now estimated at an increase of 300.

March’s biggest losers among the broad industry categories were:

>fabricated metal products, a big sector whose 4,100 contraction represented its second straight month in the red after 23 months of expansion, and its worst such performance since the 18,400 nosedive of July, 2020 – when the economy was recovering from the devastating first wave of the CCP Virus. Worse, February’s initially reported jobs decline of 1,100 was downgraded to one of 1,200.

Due to these dreary results, fabricated metals jobs have now shrunk by 1.45 percent since just before the pandemic and consequent lockdowns and voluntary behavioral curbs began kneecapping the economy in Febuary, 2020. As of last month’s jobs report, this figure stood at 1.15 percent;

>chemicals, another sizable industry, where 4,000 workers lost jobs – the worst such performance since December’s 5,900 plunge. February’s initially reported 2,500 employment growth was revised up to 2,900, but since just before the pandemic’s arrival in the United States in force, chemicals makers’ payrolls are now 6.96 percent higher, versus the 7.40 percent calculable last month.

>non-metallic mineral products, which saw a fall-off of 2,200 positions in its worst employment month since last month, when it shed 5,000 jobs. In addition, February’s initially reported jobs increase of 1,500 has been revised way down to one of 200.

These setbacks have depressed this small sector’s post-February, 2020 job growth from the 3.74 percent calculable last month to 2.81 percent; and .

>plastics and rubber products, a medium-sized category where 2,200 workers were let go. February’s initially reported 4,700 employment tumble was revised down to one of 4,400. But head counts in thse sectors are now 2.66 percent greater than just before the CCP Virus’ arrival in force, versus the 2.99 percent calculable last month.

Aside from machinery, RealityChek has been tracking employment in automotive manufacturing because of its special importance to industry overall and the economy in general.

Vehicle- and parts-makers boosted employment in March by 3,700, and February’s initially reported increase of 200 was upgraded all the way up to one of 1,300. These advances pushed automotive’s post-February, 2020 payrolls improvement from the 5.91 percent calculable last month to 6.45 percent.

RealityChek has also been monitoring several narrower sectors that have attracted special attention during the CCP Virus era, but where the data are always a month behind those of the above broader sectors, Their employment performances were overall positive but with one exception modestly so.

Although global semiconductor supplies in general are no longer in shortage, supply problems continue dogging certain industries (see, e.g., here), and of course Washington has now approved major long-term funding to boost output in the United States.

So it’s more than a little interesting that employment in the “semiconductors and related devices” category slipped by 600 in February for its second straight monthly fall-off. Moreover, that January decrease of 200 was initially reported as an increase of 300.

Consequently, the workforce in this sector is now 10.20 percent bigger than in immediately pre-pandemic-y February, 2020, versus the 10.79 percent calculable last month.

In aircaft manufacturing, which was damaged by pandemic-era travel curbs and Boeing’s production woes, a strong employment comeback continued in February. Companies in this industry added 1,300 employees that month. With,January’s 400 increase staying unrevised, aircraft employment closed to within 2.92 percent of its February, 2020 level, versus the 3.45 percent gap calculable last month.

The head count in aircraft engines and engine parts-makers surged by 900 in February, in those companies’ best such performance since last July’s identical number. January’s initally reported increase of 100 jobs is now revised down to no change, but payrolls in this sector are now just 7.10 percent off their immediate pre-pandemic levels, versus the 7.97 percent calculable last month.

Non-engine aircraft parts jobs jumped by 1,300 – the best such performance since last January’s 1,400. This past January’s initially reported gain of 100 was unrevised, leaving employment in these businesses off by 15.44 percent since just before the pandemic’s February, 2020 arrival in force. As of last month’s jobs report, the shortfall was 16.44 percent.

Surgical appliances- and supplies-makers turn out many of the products used to fight the pandemic, and their workforce expanded by 200 in February – their best such performance since last August’s 800. January’s initially reported gain of 100 was unrevised, too, leaving employment levels a surprisingly low 1.23 percent above immediate pre-pandemic levels, versus the 1.14 calculable last month.

Pharmaceuticals and medicines companies shed 300 jobs in February, but that retreat followed January net hiring that was revised down only from 1,800 to 1,700. These changes pushed post-February, 2020 employment growth in these industries down from 14.54 percent to a still healthy 14.41 percent.

The pharmaceutical sub-sector that contains vaccines added 300 jobs in February, its best such performance since its gain of 600 last October. January’s initially reported 100 employment decline was revised down to decrease of 300, leaving its workforce twenty percent greater than in immediately pre-pandemic-y February, 2020, versus the 19.90 percent calculable last month.

At this point, I’d expect manufacturing’s current hiring woes to ease before too long, mainly because I continue doubting that American politicians or central bankers will permit the economy to fall into major recession (or even slow down much further) as a new presidential election approaches, and because a post-pandemic rebound in civilian aircraft demand is already hiking production at Boeing and its vast supply chain. Pressures to increase defense budgets further, and significant federal support for infrastructure building and repair, and semiconductor output will help, too. 

Headwinds aren’t completely gone – mainly the possibility that hopes for an economic soft-landing prove naive (perhaps because of a banking turmoil-spurred credit crunch), and ongoing weakness in the foreign markets to which U.S. industry exports.  But at the very least, so far they seem no match for the stimulative gusts we can expect from American politics.        

(What’s Left of) Our Economy: U.S. Manufacturing Output Surprises to the Upside Again

Tags

aerospace, aircraft, aircraft parts, automotive, banking crisis, CCP Virus, chemicals, computer and electronics products, coronavirus, COVID 19, Federal Reserve, inflation-adjusted output, interest rates, machinery, manufacturing, manufacturing production, medical equipment, miscellaneous non-durable goods, monetary policy, pharmaceuticals, plastics and rubber products, recession, semiconductors, textiles, wood products, {What's Left of) Our Economy

Remember one of the signature expressions of 1960s sitcom character Gomer Pyle – “Surprise, surprise, surprise!”? That was my reaction to this morning’s Federal Reserve release on U.S. manufacturing production for February, which reported a second straight increase.

The February improvement was pretty marginal to be sure – 0.12 percent in after-inflation terms (the kind of numbers that will be presented here unless otherwise specified). And since its production is down on net since last February, domestic industry is still in recession. But any official gain in the hard data is noteworthy, given the lousy February sentiment-based survey results put out by many of the Federal Reserve’s regional branches (e.g., here), which have continued into March (e.g., here), and by leading private sector groups (e.g., here).

Also unexpected: January’s increase was revised up from one of 0.94 percent to one of 1.35 percent. That’s the best such performance since October, 2021’s 1.70 percent. So maybe that January figure wasn’t a one-off, as I speculated last month?

That’s not clear yet. Both the January and February advances also might still stem from a baseline effect – specifically, catch-up from an absolutely terrible December. That month’s manufacturing output decline has now been revised down a second time. Its 2.06 percent sequential dropoff is the worst such result since the 3.64 percent nose-dive in weather-affected February, 2021. But as that journalistic cliché goes, “It’s too soon to tell.”

Here’s what we do know – so far (keeping in mind that revisions of all statistics going back to 2021 will be issued on March 28).

The February report means that U.S.-based manufacturing output is now up since since just before the CCP Virus pandemic arrived stateside in force in February, 2020 by 1.65 percent – the same figure calculable from last month’s Fed release.

Only seven of the 20 broadest manufacturing sub-sectors tracked by the Fed boosted their production in February. The biggest winners were:

>the very big chemicals industry, which expanded output by 1.24 percent. Better yet, this growth came after a January increase of 3.11 percent (the best such performance since April, 2021’s 3.97 percent). The January pop looks like catch-up from December’s 2.63 slump (the worst such performance since weather-affected February, 2021’s 6.69 percent cratering). But the February follow-on could be a sign of truly regained strength.

Since immediately pre-pandemic-y February, 2020, chemicals production is up 7.52 percent, versus the 6.11 percent calculable last month;

>computer and electronic products, where production advanced for the first time since last September – and by 1.22 percent. But now it’s contracted by 0.62 percent during the CCP Virus era, versus having grown by 2.95 percent as of last month’s release; and

>wood products, whose output rose for the second straight month after having slumped for most of the past year. Not so coincidentally, this losing streak paralleled the housing industry woes prompted by the Federal Reserve’s historically rapid interest rate hikes. The February 1.11 percent gain was the best since the 2.81 percent surge last February.

But the wood products industry is still 2.49 percent smaller than it was just before the pandemic’s arrival in force, versus the 2.56 percent calculable last month.

The biggest February maufacturing output losers were:

>textiles and products, which saw production sag by 2.11 percent, the biggest decrease since last June’s 3.44 percent. The fall-off depressed output in this small sector to 12.96 percent below its February, 2020 level, versus the 8.93 percent calculable last month;

>plastics and rubber products, whose production decrease of 1.82 percent was its seventh straight monthly loss, and dragged its output losses down to 5.62 percent below its immediate pre-pandemic levels versus the 4.33 percent calculable last month; and

>miscellaneous non-durable goods, where output slipped by 1.52 percent, and pushed production down to 14.95 below its pre-pandemic level versus the 13.76 percent calculable last month.

Output also drooped in two sectors of continuing special importance to all of industry and the entire economy.

The story of CCP Virus era U.S.-based manufacturing has been in many respects a story of the automotive sector, and in February, vehicle and parts production dipped by 0.28 percent. This advance helped it draw to within 0.12 percent of its size in February, 2020, from the 1.61 percent shortfall calculable last month.

The diverse machinery industry, meanwhile, is crucial both to the rest of manufacturing and to the entire economy because its products are used so widely for retooling and modernization. So its growth indicates general manufacturing and overall business optimism, and vice versa.

Ordinarily, therefore, a moderately 0.40 percent monthly decline in machinery output would be moderately bearish, but the sector has been too volatile lately to be certain. The February decline followed a 3.42 percent burst that was the strongest since 5.12 percent pop of January, 2021. That’s a sign of a catch-up effect.

But the January results followed a 2.59 percent tumble in December that was the worst since last May’s 3.34 percent. All told, however, machinery output is now 5.54 percent greater than just before the pandemic struck, versus the 4.77 percent calculable last month.

Manufacturing sectors of special importance since the pandemic struck also suffered generally lousy Februarys performances.

The semiconductor shortages that have caused so many headaches for U.S. and foreign manufacturers seem to be easing, but supplies remain inadequate for many customers. And the situation won’t be helped by the 1.65 percent real output decrease U.S.-based chip production suffered in February.

Worse, this decrease was the sector’s eighth in a row – and some of these estimates have been revised down substantially. Due to these poor and worsening results, whereas as of last month’s Fed release, U.S. semiconductor output was 4.47 percent above its immediate pre-CCPVirus levels; now it’s 7.83 percent below.

Medical equipment and supplies, which contains the healthcare products used so widely to combat the pandemic, suffered a 0.73 percent real output contraction – its fifth straight monthly decrease.

Medical equipment and supplies output in February dropped for the fifth time in the last six months. But even with this latest 0.51 percent retreat, production in this sector – which includes so many of the products used to fight the CCP Virus – is now 10.52 percent higher than jut before the pandemic hit, versus the 9.85 percent calculable last month.

Production in pharmaceuticals and medicines was off by 0.54 percent in February, but the decrease was the first since last July, and depressed this big sector’s growth since immediately prepandemic-y February, 2020 to 20.42 percent versus the 21.44 percent calculable last month.

The exceptions to this pattern were aircraft and aircraft parts-makers – possibly because industry giant Boeing’s fortunes seem to be looking up finally. Their output increased by 0.35 percent in February, and is now up 30.19 percent since the advent of a pandemic that long hammered travel of all kinds, versus the 35.81 percent calculable last month.

What lies ahead? The entrails remain difficult to read, especially since the new banking crisis is creating doubt as to whether the Federal Reserve will continue an inflation-fighting effort it’s been making vigorously but that still hasn’t produced the economy slowdown it’s seeking – but that may at some point because these monetary tightening moves typically don’t start working for many months. See what I mean? 

If the central bank remains on course, domestic manufacturing’s troubles seem certain to return. But as long as the economy keeps defiantly expanding, its power may bring U.S.-based industry securely back into growth mode.

(What’s Left of) Our Economy: U.S. Manufacturing’s Employment Win Streak Comes to an End

Tags

aircraft, aircraft engines, aircraft parts, apparel, automotive, CCP Virus, chemicals, computer and electronics products, coronavirus, COVID 19, Employment, furniture, Jobs, machinery, manufacturing, non-farm jobs, non-metallic mineral products, pharmaceuticals, plastics and rubber products, private sector, semiconductors, surgical equipment, textiles, vaccines, {What's Left of) Our Economy

A payrolls loss even as the rest of the American economy continued to create gobs of jobs – that was the big manufacturing takeaway from this morning’s official release on U.S. employment for February.

Although job creation for the non-farm economy (the federal government’s definition of the U.S. employment universe) came in at a robust 311,000, domestic industry shed headcount (by 4,000) for the first time since April, 2021.

Moreover, the modest manufacturing job increase of January, which contrasted so strikingly with the blowout performance recorded by non-farm businesses overall, was revised down – from an initially reported 19,000 to 13,000. The initially reported January total U.S. jobs gain of 517,000 was reduced this morning as well. But unlike the manufacturing results, the new figure (504,000) is still astronomical.

The new February numbers pushed U.S.-based manufacturing deeper into CCP Virus-era employment laggard status. Since February, 2020 (just before the pandemic arrived in force in the United States), domestic industry has boosted headcount by 1.55 percent. the private sector overall by 2.59 percent, and the non-farm sector (which includes public sector workers at all levels of government) by 1.96 percent.

As of last month’s release, manufacturing jobs were up 1.67 percent since February, 2020, private sector jobs up 2.46 percent, and non-farm jobs up 1.77 percent.

Consequently, manufacturing’s share of non-farm jobs has sunk from the 8.38 percent calculable as of last month’s report to 8.36 percent, and from its immediate pre-pandemic level of 8.39 percent.

And its share of private sector jobs is down from the 9.80 percent calculable last month to 9.77 percent, and from its immediate pre-pandemic level of 9.87 percent.

February’s biggest manufacturing jobs winners were:

>computer and electronics products, which added 2,800 workers on month fo its best such performance since last October’s 3,300. In addition, January’s initially reported 700 employment drop is judged to be an increase of 100.

These companies’ workforces are now 2.08 percent higher than in immediately pre-pandemic-y February, 2020, versus the 1.77 percent increase calculable last month;

>chemicals, whose payrolls expanded by 2,500 in a resumption of a multi-year string of healthy monthly gains. Indeed, this sequential advance followed an upwardly revised loss of 1,400 jobs that was the sector’s worst such performance since the 2,200 decline in May, 2021.

Chemicals employment is now 7.40 percent greater than it was just before the pandemic struck versus the 6.80 percent growth calculable as of last month;

>beverage, tobacco and leather products (a new name for miscellaneous non-durable goods), which hired 1,900 workers in February. January’s initially reported rise of 5,000 (which had been its best such performance since last June’s 6,300 surge) has now been downgraded to one of 3,100, but remained strong nonetheless.

Job levels in this sector, therefore, are still up by an impressive 10.42 percent since February, 2020 – down just slightly from the 10.45 percent calculable last month; and

>non-metallic mineral products, which boosted payrolls by 1,500, but whose excellent first-reported January results (4,200 – thought to be the best since last February’s 5,600 pop) have also been downwardly revised (to 1,700).

Companies in this sector have now boosted their workforces by 3.74 percent since the virus’ arrival state-side in force, versus the 4.02 percent calculable last month.

February’s biggest manufacturing jobs losers were:

>plastics and rubber products, where employment fell by 4,700 to resume a weak employment stretch that began last October. January’s gain, meanwhile, was revised from 1,200 to 1,100.

Employment in these industries is now 2.99 higher than in February, 2020 – above the overall manufacturing figure but down from the 3.52 percent calculable last month;

>furniture and related products, which also continued a recent losing streak by cutting 2,800 positions. At least January’s initially reported decrease of 700 has been upgraded to one of 500. Headcounts in these sectors are now off by 3.60 percent since the CCP Virus began roiling the U.S. economy in February, 2020, versus the 2.71 percent calculable last month;

>textile mills, a very small sector whose 1,700 jobs retreat was its worst such perfomance since the identical decrease in July, 2020 – as the economy had begun recovering from the effects of the CCP Virus’ first wave. Further, January’s initially reported 900 jobs gain was revised down to one of 700.

These results left textile mill employment 10.88 percent lower than in February, 2020 versus the 8.91 percent calculable last month; and

>apparel, another very small industry, which cut employment by 1,300. This loss, moreover, comes on top of a January drop of 1,900 that was initially reported as one of 2,100. The apparel workforce is now 11.32 percent smaller than just before the pandemic’s arrival in force, versus the 9.02 percent calculable last month.

RealityChek has also been tracking employment in two industries of special importance to manufacturing and the economy overall, and both eaked out tiny hiring increases in February.

Machinery data have been an emphasis because its products are used to equip and modernize nearly all manufacturing and non-manufacturing sectors. So changes in its workforce can signal optimism or pessimism about their prospects.

This big, varied sector extended its monthly job creation winning streak to nine in February, but by a bare 400. January’s results remained in the black, too, but were revised down from an increase of 2,000 to one of 1,000. Payrolls in machinery have now grown by 1.10 percent since just before the pandemic era began, in February, 2020, versus the 1.13 percent calculable last month.

Automotive’s February headcount gain was even smaller – just 200. Nor was it much of a rebound from January’s contraction, which was revised up from one of 6,500 loss to one of 5,100. But the automotive workforce is now 5.91 percent larger than in February, 2020, versus the 5.70 percent calculable last month.

Monitored by RealityChek as well have been several narrower sectors that have attracted special attention during the CCP Virus era, but where the data are always a month behind those of the above broader sectors, Their employment performances were overall positive but with one exception modestly so.

The shortages plaguing the semiconductor industry have bled over into much of the rest of the economy in recent years, which largely explains why Washington has now decided to spend tens of billions of dollars over the next decade to support more domestic production.

Jobs in the category called “semiconductors and related devices” inched up by 300 in January, but – continuing a pattern described above elsewhere in manufacturing – December’s initially reported increase of 800 is now judged to have been just 400. The workforce in this grouping has now grown by 10.79 percent since just before the pandemic struck in full force – a figure that’s better than it looks since these companies’ cut relatively few jobs during the short but deep virus-induced downturn of spring, 2020.

Aircaft manufacturing was pummeled by a combination of pandemic-era travel curbs and Boeing’s production woes, but employment lately has staged a strong comeback. January’s net new hires numbered 400 and December’s initially reported jump of 1,100 has been upgraded to one of 1,500.

Job levels in the sector have now closed to within 3.45 percent of their immediate pre-pandemic numbers, versus having been down 5.56 percent as of last month’s jobs report.

Aircraft engines and engine parts-makers added just 100 new employees in January, but December’s increase of 800 – the best such performance since July’s 900 – remained unrevised. Their payrolls are now just 7.97 percent lower than their immediate pre-pandemic total versus the 8.08 percent shortfall calculable last month.

Non-engine aircraft parts producers reduced their workforces by 100 in January, but December’s hiring increase was revised from 100 to 200. So their headcounts are still off by 16.44 percent during the pandemic period – the same figure calculable last month.

Surgical appliances- and supplies-makers have been in the spotlight since the virus’ arrival in force, since this grouping contains so many of the products used to fight the pandemic. They increased their workforces by 100 in January, but December’s initially reported loss of 400 is now judged to have been one of 500.

As with non-engine aircraft parts their employment level since February, 2020 stayed the same as calculable in December, but in the case of surgical appliances and supplies, the change has been positive – by 1.14 percent.

The big pharmaceuticals and medicines sector was a notable exception to this employment pattern of marginal change, as its companies’ boosted employment by 1,800. But these gains followed December cuts that were upgraded from an initially reported 1,100 to 2,000 – the sector’s worst such performance since the 2,900 nosedive last July.

Yet upward revisions in previous months enabled the gain in the pharmaceuticals and medicines employment to rise since February, 2020 from the 14.25 percent calculable last month to 14.54 percent.

The news was much worse in the pharmaceutical sub-sector that contains vaccines. Employment tumbled in January for the second straight month (by 100) and December’s initially reported plunge of 1,200 is now pegged as one of 1,300.

These drops depressed this grouping’s employment expansion since immediately pre-pandemic-y February, 2020 – but only from the 20.10 percent calculable last month to a still sterling 19.90 percent.

With the U.S. economy lately growing more vigorously than widely predicted, it’s certainly possible that its surprising strength will bring an end to manufacturing’s ongoing production recession and its recent weak hiring.  And the federal government has certainly been trying to lend a helping hand via the aforementioned semiconductor subsidies, along with an infrastructure bill, and  green subsidies – both of which contain Buy American requirements. 

But it’s also possible that the last few months’ worth of data are telling us that the fortunes of manufacturing and the rest of the domestic economy are being decoupled.  Indeed, industry’s still towering trade deficit is one indication, making clear that the consumption of manufactures remains much greater than their production. 

Compounding the uncertainty:  February’s manufacturing jobs loss could be washed away via revisions in next month’s jobs report.  But at the least, this first employment drop in nearly two years might signal that domestic manufacturers are no longer hoarding workers as zealously as other sectors of the economy have been.  If so, expect manufacturing employment to continue stagnating.         

(What’s Left of) Our Economy: Those New U.S. Manufacturing Growth Numbers Look Like a Head Fake

Tags

aerospace, aircraft, aircraft parts, apparel, automotive, Federal Reserve, furniture, machinery, manufacturing, medical equipment, miscellaneous non-durable goods, non-metallic mineral products, petroleum and coal products, pharmaceuticals, plastics and rubber products, printing, recession, semiconductors, textiles, wood products, {What's Left of) Our Economy

U.S.-based manufacturing’s inflation-adjusted output rose a surprising 0.94 percent sequentially in January, according to today’s report from the Federal Reserve. Moreover, the real production increases were widespread, with 15 of the 20 broadest sub-sectors growing in real terms.

But to me, the results look like a one-off, for two main reasons. First, the January gain was domestic industry’s best such performance since last February’s 1.23 percent jump. That alone suggests a departure from a longer-lasting (and therefore more important) pattern. Indeed, according to most definitions, manufacturing remains in recession despite the January pop, with constant-dollar output down on net by 1.57 percent since March.

Second, a baseline effect may well be at work here – in this case, with price-adjusted production simply engaging in some catch-up from an unusually bad (even by recent dreary standards) prior read. In this vein, December’s sequential tumble of a downwardly revised 1.77 percent was domestic industry’s worst such performance since the 3.64 percent plunge in weather-affected February, 2021.

On the plus side, the January numbers leave U.S.-based manufacturing output 1.65 percent higher since just before the CCP Virus pandemic arrived stateside in force in February, 2020. As of last month’s Fed release, this advance stood at 1.21 percent.

The biggest manufacturing monthly growth winners mirrored to some extent the total sector’s pattern of a multi-month best followed by multi-month worsts. They were:

>apparel and leather goods,whose 3.66 real production surge was the best since its 5.92 burst last June. But this gain followed a December drop of 0.70 percent that was the biggest since last August’s 2.95 percent;

>non-metallic mineral products, where the inflation-adjusted production advance of 2.39 percent was its strongest since last February’s 4.39 percent. But this increase followed a 0.83 slip that was the worst since last April’s 1.52 percent retreat;

>miscellaneous non-durable goods, where constant dollar growth of 2.24 percent was its best such gain since last March’s 2.63 percent. But its November loss of 2.39 percent was the greatest since last May’s 2.57 percent; and

>textiles and products, which boosted price-adjusted output by 2.20 percent – its best such perfomance since the 2.33 percent rise in March, 2021. But in December, the sector shrank in real terms by a sizable 0.99 percent.

As for January’s monthly production losers, they started or extended losing streaks:

>plastics and rubber products’ constant-dollar output fell by 0.96 percent in its sixth straight decline;

>wood products’ after-inflation production sank for a second consecutive month – this time by 0.94 percent;

>furniture’s 0.70 decrease was its fourth straight retreat; and

>printing and related activities’ 0.56 shrinkage was its second straight drop.

The other January monthly production loser – petroleum and coal products – experienced only a 0.17 percent dip.  That was just its second straight, but followed a 3.22 percent plunge that was its worst since the 5.75 percent nosedive of weather-affected February, 2021.

Two sectors of continuing special importance to both all of industry and the entire economy displayed real production increases in January that looked especially baseline-y.

RealityChek regulars know that the fortunes of the automotive sector went far toward explaining manufacturing’s overall performance in the early pandemic period in particular. Real vehicle and parts making output climbed by 0.54, but this January improvement came after two big drops that included November’s 3.68 percent – its worst month since last February’s 3.81 percent fall-off.

Machinery-making matters because its products are used so widely by all other sectors to retool and modernize. So the 1.74 percent inflation-adjusted production increase achieved by these companies – their best such performance since last August’s 2.03 percent – would seem to indicate American business optimism about its future prospects. But this jump followed a 2.55 percent decline that was machinery’s worst since last May’s 3.34 percent.

Manufacturing sectors of special importance since the pandemic struck turned in mixed January performances.

The semiconductor industry, long plagued by shortages and in line to receive massive federal government assistance, saw price-adjusted production worsen by 0.36 percent. This seventh consecutive monthly decline followed three major decreases that included a 2.61 percent loss in December that was the sector’s worst since last April’s 3.17 percent.

Medical equipment and supplies, which contains the healthcare products used so widely to combat the pandemic, suffered a 0.73 percent real output contraction – its fifth straight monthly decrease.

More encouraging results were recorded for aircraft and aircraft parts makers – which were hit so hard by pandemic-induced travel curbs. Their January growth after inflation of 0.54 percent was their fourth straight gain.

And pharmaceuticals and medicines’ constant dollar output improvement of 0.75 percent was its sixth straight advance.

Since the entire U.S. economy keeps defying predictions of recession, no one can reasonably rule out domestic manufacturing benefiting from this unexpected strength. But at least in the short term, the nation is eminently capable of continuing to grow despite troubles in industry, and much more encouraging manufacturing data will be needed to show convincingly that this won’t be the case again.    

(What’s Left of) Our Economy: Amid a U.S.-Wide Hiring Burst, Manufacturing Job Creation Trudges Along

Tags

aircraft, aircraft engines, aircraft parts, automotive, CCP Virus, chemicals, computer and electronics products, coronavirus, COVID 19, Employment, fabricated metal product, Federal Reserve, food manufacturing, inflation, Jobs, machinery, manufacturing, medicines, non-farm payrolls, non-metallic mineral products, pharmaceuticals, private sector, recession, semiconductors, surgical equipment, transportation equipment, vaccines, {What's Left of) Our Economy

Although today’s official new U.S. jobs report (for January) showed a completely unexpected burst of monthly employment creation for the economy as a whole, domestic manufacturing shared only modestly in this sequential boom. Moreover, some long-term revisions released along with the new numbers show that U.S.-based industry remains in a hiring slowdown, though one less severe than previously reported.

Between December and January, domestic manufacturers increased payrolls by 19,000 – the best such result since October’s 37,000. December’s initially reported gain of 8,000 has been upgraded to one of 12,000, and November’s identical original estimate of an 8,000 monthly rise now stands at 14,000.

In addition, according to the revisions, for full-year 2022, manufacturing expanded its headcounts by 396,000 (3.15 percent) versus the 379,000 (3.02 percent) recorded last month.

Consequently, domestic industry’s employment advance still decelerated during the second half of last year, the slowdown was less than initially reported. As of last month’s jobs report, its average monthly job creation downshifted from 39,830 between January and June to 23,330 between July and December. Yet the revisions judge that the first half average was 39,170 and that the second half average was 26,830.

January’s biggest manufacturing jobs winners among the broadest sub-sectors tracked by the U.S. Labor Department were:

>food manufacturing, where hiring hit 6,900. Head counts in this very big industry moved 4.33 percent higher than in immediately pre-pandemic-y February, 2020, versus the 3.79 percent calculable in last month’s pre-revisions data (the figure that will be used for comparison unless otherwise specified);

>beverage, tobacco, and leather and allied product manufacturing (a new name for miscellaneous non-durable goods), which added 5,000 employees on net for its best such performance since last June’s 6,300 pop. Headcounts here are now 10.45 percent above their February, 2020 level, versus the 9.75 percent rise calculable last month;

>non-metallic minerals, whose workforce grew by 4,200 in its best monthly advance since last February’s 5,600. Jobs are now up 4.02 percent since just before the CCP Virus’ arrival stateside in force, versus the 0.14 percent increase calculable as of last month; and

>fabricated metal product, whose companies added 3,100 employees. Even so, employment in this very big sector sank to 0.91 percent less than in February, 2020, versus the 0.73 percent shortfall calculable last month.

The biggest January job losers among the broadest manufacturing sub-sectors were:

>transportation equipment, a big, diverse group of industries whose 8,400 sequential jobs decline followed a six-month tear that featured a surge of 15,000 in December. Still, the latest result was the worst since last May’s 8,700 plunge. Employment in the transportation equipment cluster has climbed by 2.57 percent since that last full data month before the pandemic’s arrival, versus the two percent figure calculable last month;

>chemicals, another large, diverse category that lost 3,500 workers on month in January. This second straight big drop, however, followed a strong run that began back in late 2021, and employment has now improved by 6.80 percent since February, 2020, versus the 6.44 percent rise calculable last month; and

>computer and electronics product manufacturing shed 700 positions in its weakest monthly perfomance sinc September’s 1,300 drop. But its payrolls moved up to 1.77 percent higher during the pandemic period and its emerging aftermath, versus the 1.39percent increase calculable last month.

RealityChek also tracks employment in two industries of special importance to manufacturing and the economy overall, and their January employment experiences differed dramatically.

Machinery matters greatly because its products are used extensively in nearly all manufacturing and non-manufacturing sectors, and changes in its workforce can signal optimism or pessimism about their prospects.

So the 2,000 monthly increase in machinery workers in January seems to augur well for continued expansion. Moreover, this gain pushed the sector’s employment levels back above where they were just before the pandemic began roiling and distorting the nation’s economy and society – by 1.13 percent. As of last month, they were still 0.24 percent less than in February, 2020.

Yet the automotive industry, whose fortunes have greatly affected domestic industry’s aggregate performance for most of the pandemic period, saw head counts tumble by 6,500 in its worst such performance since last February’s 23,900 plunge. Despite the setback, however, the motor vehicle and parts workforce is now 5.70 percent bigger than just before the pandemic’s arrival, versus the 5.46 percent calculable last month.

RealityChek also tracks a number of narrower sectors that have attracted special attention during the CCP Virus era, but where the data are always a month behind those of the above broader sectors,and their Decembers were substantially mixed jobs-wise, too. Comparisons with pre-revisions November data aren’t possible in these cases, though, because those figures aren’t publicly available.

The shortage-plagued semiconductor and electronic components industries boosted its payrolls by 800, bringing their employment levels 5.56 percent above their totals in immediately pre-pandemic-y February, 2020.

The aircraft manufacturers that were so hard hit both by pandemic-era travel curbs and Boeing’s production woes, continued a recent employment rebound by adding 1,100 more workers in December. But they still employ 5.56 percent fewer than just before the virus’ arrival.

Not surprisingly, aircraft engines and engine parts-makers hired another 800 employees that month for their best such performance since July’s 900. Their headcounts are now off just 8.08 percent since February, 2020.

Non-engine aircraft parts producers’ payrolls increased by 100, but are still down 16.44 percent since the pandemic era began.

The story was very different, however, in many of America’s key healthcare manufacturing sectors, as all three followed here reported December job cuts.

In the surgical appliances and supplies industries that turn out so many of the products used to fight the CCP Virus, employment fell by 400 – their worst such performance since last June’s 600 decline. Their headcounts are now just 1.14 percent bigger than in February, 2020

The big pharmaceuticals and medicines sectors shrank their workforces by 1,100 – the most since July’s 2,900 falloff. But employment here is still up 14.25 percent since that last full pre-pandemic data month of February, 2020.

The pharmaceutical sub-sector that contains vaccines let 1,200 employees go in December in its worst such performance since back in December, 2018 when they also laid off 1,200. But since February, 2020, their payrolls have still risen by 20.10 percent.

Optimists can legitimately observe that U.S.-based manufacturing’s meh employment increases lately have been pretty impressive given that the sector has been in a recession (albeit a mild one) for just over a year. But since the pandemic’s peak in the spring of 2020, it’s benefited pretty consistently from a strongly recovering broader economy. It’s anything but clear if domestic industry can keep up even that sluggish pace if the Federal Reserve’s anti-inflation policies do start slowing growth, much less trigger a recession.    

(What’s Left of) Our Economy: Today’s Really Recession-y U.S. Manufacturing Production Report

Tags

aircraft, aircraft parts, Federal Reserve, machinery, manufacturing, medical devices, medical equipment, miscellaneous transportation equipment, nonmetallic mineral products, output, petroleum and coal products, pharmaceuticals, primary metals, printing, production, real output, recession, semiconductors, soft landing, {What's Left of) Our Economy

A U.S. recession is either imminent or already here – that’s the main message being strongly suggested by today’s release by the Federal Reserve on inflation-adjusted manufacturing production (for December).

Not only did industry’s real output sink by 1.30 percent sequentially – the worst such result since February, 2021’s 3.64 percent weather-affected plunge. But November’s initially reported 0.62 percent retreat was revised down to one of 1.10 percent.

Two straight monthly drops of one percent or more each haven’t been recorded by U.S.-based manufacturers since the February through April, 2020 period – when the arrival of the CCP Virus began roiling American life and the national economy, and indeed threw the latter into a deep downturn.

The new figures pushed price-adjusted U.S. manufacturing production into contraction for full-year 2022 – by 0.41 percent. That’s a major deterioration from the 4.19 percent constant dollar gain in 2021 – the strongest such showing since the 6.48 percent achieved in 2010, during the recovery from the Global Financial Crisis and ensuing Great Recession.

Moreover, since just before the pandemic arrived in force in the United States (February, 2020), after-inflation manufactuing has now grown by just 1.21 percent. As of last month’s industrial production release, this figure stood at 3.07 percent.

Of the twenty broadest manufacturing sub-sectors tracked by the Fed, only three boosted monthly inflation-adjusted production in December: aeropace and miscellaneous transportation equipment (0.96 percent), primary metals (0.84 percent), and nononmetallic mineral products (0.65 percent).

The biggest losers among their 17 other counterparts were machinery and printing and related support activities (3.37 percent each), and petroleum and coal products (3.13 percent).

Especially concerning, and continuing a pattern identified last month – for machinery and printing, these results were the worst since April, 2020, at the peak of the CCP Virus’ devastating first wave, when their real output collapsed month-to-month by 18.64 percent and 23.10 percent, respectively. Meanwhile, the monthly decrease in petroleum and coal products was its biggest since weather-affected February, 2021.

And as known by RealityChek regulars, machinery’s tumble last month is a particularly bright red flag. Because its products are used so widely in sectors inside and outside of manufacturing – including by growing companies or firms counting on continued or faster growth – its fortunes are seen as a good predictor of the economy’s future. Therefore, a big machinery production decrease (the second in a row) could well mean that business activity across the national board is at least slowing markedly and won’t be reviving any time soon.

The December numbers were only somewhat better for sectors of special interest since the CCP Virus’ arrival stateside. Sequential increases were registered in pharmaceuticals and medicine (by 1.10 percent) and aircraft and parts (by 1.49 percent). But price-adjusted output fell in automotive (by 1.03 percent), the shortage-plagued semiconductor industry (by 1.20 percent), and the medical equipment and supplies sector that encompasses products heavily used to fight the pandemic (by 2.50 percent).

In addition, the slippage in medical equipment and supplies was one of those that was the greatest since the peak of the CCP Virus’ first wave (when it nosedived by 17.76 percent).

Since manufacturing is only about fifteen or sixteen percent of the total U.S. economy (depending on how you count output), a downturn in industry doesn’t necessarily presage an overall recession. But the new industrial production statistics aren’t the only signs of shrinkage. Consumer spending comprises nearly 71 percent of the economy according to the latest (third quarter, 2021) data, and today’s advance official retail sales report (for December) indicates that they’ve now fallen consecutively for two months. Possibly weaker inflation (indicated most recently by today’s wholesale price report, which I’ll post about tomorrow), also signals gloomy times ahead.

Since the new Fed manufacturing production results will be revised several times over the next few months, it’s possible that the real picture in industry could brighten somewhat. But likelier, in my view (as I wrote yesterday), is for a recession-averse Washington to move to stimulate consumer spending without seeking similar results for production – in other words, a time-tested formula for stagflation at best for the foreseeable future.

P.S. As alert readers may have noticed, this post contains many fewer manufacturing production details than its recent predecessors. My aim is to ensure that I can get this info to you on a same-day basis. Do you like this simpler format better? Or should I return to going deeper into the weeds? Please let me know if you get a chance.         

        

(What’s Left of) Our Economy: Manufacturing Job Creation Downshifts Further

Tags

aerospace, aircraft, aircraft engines, aircraft parts, automotive, CCP Virus, chemicals, coronavirus, COVID 19, Employment, fabricated metal products, food products, furniture, Jobs, machinery, manufacturing, non-metallic mineral products, petroleum and coal products, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, surgical equipment, transportation equipment, vaccines, {What's Left of) Our Economy

No doubt about it now – at least for now. As yesterday’s official U.S. employment data (for December) confirm, domestic manufacturing is experiencing a pronounced job-creation slowdown.

Of course, these latest figures, as well as November’s, are still preliminary. But it would take mammoth revisions to change this narrative. U.S.-based manufacturers upped their payrolls by only 8,000 on month in December. On top of the same (downwardly revised) November employee increase, those last two data months have each seen industry’s weakest job gains since the 28,000 loss suffered in April, 2021. And the new October and November figures are downgrades, too.

Another perspective: During the first half of this year, manufacturing employment rose by an average of 39,830. So far, during the second half of the year, this monthly average is down to 23,330.

Moreover, the unimpressive recent results have placed the private sector overall ahead of manufacturing as an employment generator during the post-CCP Virus period. Since February, 2020 – the last full data month before the pandemic began hammering and roiling the economy – the former’s head counts are up 1.29 percent versus 1.17 percent for manufacturing. Last month, manufacturing held the lead by 1.17 percent to 1.16 percent. (Government payrolls at all levels are still down by 1.91 percent during this stretch.

Consequently, manufacturing’s share of total U.S. private sector jobs slipped for the second straight month – from 9.86 percent to 9.85 percent. But industry’s strong two years of hiring mean that this percentage is still higher than the immediate pre-CCP Virus level of 9.83 percent. And the December results still left the manufacturing workforce at its highest level (12.934 million) since November, 2008’s 13.034 million.

Nonetheless, the December jobs report was by no means devoid of bright spots, as the rundown that follows will show that several major industries created gobs of jobs during the month.

December’s biggest manufacturing jobs winners among the broadest sub-sectors tracked by the U.S. Labor Department were:

>transportation equipment, a big, diverse grouping boosted employment by 15,200 in December – its best such performance since August’s 20,900. Revisions were mixed, with November’s initially reported 6,100 advance downgraded to one of 4,500; October’s initially reported 4,700 increased revised way up to 13,200, and then again to 14,500; and September’s original 8,400 increase downgraded to 4,700 but then revised up to settle at 6,300.

Employment in transportation equipment is now 1.94 percent higher than in the last full pre-CCP Virus data month of February, 2020, versus the 1.08 percent calculable last month;

>non-metallic mineral products, where payrolls improved by 4,500 in December in the best monthly performance since December, 2020’s 5,200. Revisions were mixed here, too. November’s initially reported 1,800 gain is now recorded as a loss of 800; October’s results have gone from an increase of 3,200 to one of 2,900 and back to 3,000; and September’s initially reported 1,500 job loss was revised up to a dip of just 200 before settling at a decrease of 300.

The non-metallic mineral products workforce has now expanded by 0.57 percent since immediately pre-pandemic-y February, 2020, versus the 0.01 percent calculable last month.

>machinery, a bellwether for the entire economy, since its products are so widely used in both manufacturing and non-manufacturing sectors, enjoyed job growth of 3,300 in December. Revisions were positive overall. November’s advance of 3,900 was revised up to one of 4,200 – its best monthly increase since April’s 5,800. October’s initially reported 3,000 increase was upgraded to 3,600 but then revised back down to the original 3,000. But September’s initially reported 1,700 decrease (then the sector’s worst such total since November, 2021’s 7,000 plunge) was upgraded to a decline of just 300, where it finally settled.

This performance moved machinery’s head count to within 0.28 percent of its February, 2020 level, versus the 0.55 gap percent calculable last month;

>food manufacturing, another big industry, which saw employment rise by 3,300 in December. Revisions were overall positive. November’s initially reported 3,400 increase is now judged to have been 4,200. October’s initially reported 1,000 rise was downgraded to 500, but then revised back up to 900. And although September’s initially reported 7,800 job growth was ultimately revised down to 7,600, it was still the sector’s best such performance since February’s 11,100.

The food manufacturing workforce has now expanded by 3.80 percent since just before the pandemic’s arrival in force, versus the 3.52 percent calculable last month; and`

>fabricated metal products, another sizable sector, upped employment by 2,900 in December, and revisions were mixed. November’s net new hires were revised down from 1,300 to 500. October’s results were at first downgraded from a 5,200 increase to one of 5,000, but then revised up to 6,600 (the strongest such number since April’s identical increase. But September’s initially reported advance of 6,300 has been downgraded significantly, to 5,500 and then finally to 2,300.

Job levels in fabricated metal products is now off by 0.93 percent since February, 2020, versus a 1.18 percent shortfall calculable last month.

The biggest December jobs losers among the broadest manufacturing categories were:

>chemicals, a big category whose 5,700 employment contraction in December was its first drop since August, 2021 and by far the worst since the 20,000 nosedive of April, 2020, when the devastating effects of the CCP Virus’ first wave were peaking. Revisions, moreover, were negative on net. November’s initially reported 4,700 head count climb (then chemicals’ best result since May’s 5,100 improvement) to 3,600. After having been upgraded from 1,600 to 2,200, October’s rise was revised down to 1,700. But September’s initially reported 3,400 increase was downgraded to one of 2,700 before being upgraded again to its final level of 3,200.

The chemicals workforce is now 6.47 percent greater than in immediately pre-pandemic-y February, 2020 – down from the 7.32 percent increase calculable last month;

>petroleum and coal products, a sector whose payrolls weakened by 3,300 in December – its worst such performance since the 3,500 jobs lost in winter weather-affected January, 2021. Revisions were mixed, though. November’s initially reported 900 jobs added now stands at 1,100 (the best such increase since February’s 2,000). October’s results bounced up from an initially reported employment dip of 100 to a gain of 200 and back to a 100 loss. And September’s initially reported head count advance of 300 has stayed upgaded to 400 for three months.

But the December fall-off dragged petroleum and coal products employment down to 8.31 percent below its level just before the pandemic’s arrival in force, versus the 5.31 percent gap calculable last month;

>furniture and related products, whose 2,900 employment decrease was its worst since the 73,900 catastrophe suffered in April, 2020 – during the height of the pandemic’s first wave. Revisions, moreover, were significantly negative – no surprise given the recent woes of the nation’s housing sector. November’s initially reported slump of 1,500 is now estimated at 1,900. October’s results have deteriorated from a slip of 200 to one of 400. And September’s initially reported 300 decrease now stands at one of 600.

These employment setbacks have pushed the furniture industry’s workforce down to 2.31 percent below its February, 2020 levels, versus the 1.33 percent calculable last month; and

>miscellaneous nondurable goods, which also reduced its payrolls by 2,900 in December, and whose revisions were negative on net. November’s initially reported jobs gain of 1,200 is now pegged as a retreat of 3,300 – these companies’ worst such performance since they cut 9,400 positions in December, 2020. After October’s gain of 2,100 was upgraded to one of 3,300, it was lowered to 2,700 – which at least was still the best such performance since June’s 5,400. But September’s results have been revised up from 1,300 net new hires to 2,000 and have settled at 2,300.

This diverse group of industries’ have now enlarged their workforce by 9,68 percent since immediately pre-pandemic-y February, 2020, versus the 12.13 percent calculable last month.

As known by RealityChek regulars, throughout the CCP Virus period, the automotive industry’s employment gyrations have influenced manufacturing’s overall hiring, and in December, as with other sectors examined above, its robust job creation helped keep industry’s monthly total in the black.

Indeed, U.S.-based vehicle and parts makers added 7,400 workers on month, and revisions were positive. November’s initially reported increase of 1,900 was revised up to 2,300 – though this result was still these industries’ weakest since they shed 7,400 employees in May. But October’s initially reported rise of 4,800 has been upgraded twice – to 7,500 and then to 9,000. And September’s results have been revised from 8,300 to 7,400 and then bsck up to 9,000 – where they’ve remained.

All told, automotive’s jobs numbers are now 5.11 percent higher than in February, 2020, versus the 4.17 percent calculable last month.

RealityChek has also been following several other industries of specical interest during the pandemic era whose results are always a month behind those of the above categories. And on the whole, they expanded job creation modestly in November.

In the semiconductor sector, whose shortages have handicapped so many other industries, and which will now benefit from massive government subdidies aimed at reviving domestic production, head counts rose by 1,200, and revisions were mixed. October’s initially reported increase of 2,300 was downgraded to one of 2,200 – a total that was still the best since June, 2020’s 3,000, during the recovery from the first CCP Virus wave. But September’s figures remained donwardly revised from an initially reported gain of 800 to a loss of 1,000.

The semiconductor workforce is now 6.60 percent larger than in immediately pre-pandemic-y February, 2020, versus the 6.01 percent calculable last month.

Aerospace manufacturers were especially hard hit by the CCP Virus-era travel bans and by individuals’ reluctance to fly. But with normalization returning, these companies’ revived hiring continued on balance in November.

Aircraft makers enlarged their workforce by 300 – a performance that was actually their weakest since they cut 800 positions in January. Revisions were slightly negative, however, with October’s initially reported 3,900 revised down to 3,800 – still the sector’s best such performance since June, 2021’s 4,400 jump. And September’s initially reported advance of 1,300 stayed at a downwardly revised 1,200.

As a result, aircraft employment crept to within 5.77 percent of its immediate pre-pandemic level, versus the 5.85 percent calculable last month.

In aircraft engines- and engine parts-makers, payrolls grew by 500, and revisions were positive. October’s initially reported improvement of 700 was upgraded to one of 800, and September’s 100 job loss has remained unrevised. Employment in these industries has now contracted by 7.42 percent since February, 2020, versus the 8.83 percent calculable last month.

The exceptions to this pattern of stronger November hiring were the non-engine aircraft parts- and equipment sectors. They cut payrolls by 400 in November, and revisions were slightly negative. October’s initially reported gain of 100 was revised down to no change, and Smbeepter’s contraction stayed at 700 after having been downgraded from a loss of 500. These results left employment among these companies off by 14.45 percent during the CCP Virus era, versus the 14.36 percent calculable last month.

The healthcare manufacturers that have occupied the spotlight since the pandemic began generally added jobs in November, too. But the surgical appliances and supplies makers that turn out so many of the products used to fight the CCP Virus weren’t among them.

These companies shrank their workfoce by 800 in November in their weakest performance since identical cuts in June, and revisions were negative on balance. October’s initially reported hiring flatline was revised up to an increase of 600 – their best employment month since they added 900 positions in August. But September’s results have been downgraded to a decline of 300 after having been revised up from an advance of 1,000 to one of 1,200.

These ups and downs left this sector’s workforce just 4.83 percent larger than in immediately pre-pandemic-y February, 2020 –much lower than the 11.64 percent growth calculable last month.

By contrast, the big pharmaceuticals and medicines category boosted employment by 2,200 in November – its best such performance since June’s 4,000. Revisions were positive, too. October’s initially reported increase of 600 (which I erroneously reported last month as a flatline) was downgraded to 500, but September’s advances have been revised up from 200 to 500 to 1,200.

During the CCP Virus era, this sector has upped employment by 12.51 percent, versus the 11.64 percent calculable last month.

Finally, the medicines subsector containing vaccines hired 700 net new workers in November, but revisions were mixed. October’s initially reported gain of 600 was upgraded to one of 900 – the best improvement since the identical addition in June. But September’s results have been revised down from a rise of 500 to one of 300 after having been initially reported as a 200 increase.

Still, employment in this vaccines-centric grouping is now 27.31 percent higher than just before the pandemic hit the United States in force, versus the 26.29 percent calculable last month.

The substantial hiring increases in major industries like automotive and fabricated metals products make it difficult to forecast a significant downturn in manufacturing job creation during the next few months. And the strong job creation in machinery is especially encouraging, since it seems to indicate that companies throughout industry and the rest of the economy are ordering its products in anticipation of continued solid demand from their customers.

At the same time, the chemicals sector also provides inputs for many other industries, and its December job cuts could presage, at a minimum, a softening of activity in manufacturing and beyond. And since it began acknowledging inflation’s seriousness, the Federal Reserve seems as determined as ever to achieve such softening in order bring prices under control.

Right now, the safest bet seems to be that manufacturing job creation stays subdued, and even loses more momentum.