(What’s Left of) Our Economy: A Terrible March for U.S. Trade – With Worse Likely to Come

Tags

Advanced Technology Products, Canada, China, currency, dollar, European Union, exchange rates, exports, Federal Reserve, goods trade, imports, inflation, Japan, Made in Washington trade deficit, manufacturing, Mexico, oil, services trade, Trade, trade deficit, {What's Left of) Our Economy

So many records (mainly the wrong kind) were revealed in the latest official monthly U.S. trade figures (for March) that it’s hard to know where to begin. Some important points need to be made before delving into them, though.

First, don’t blame oil. Sure, this trade report broke new ground in containing a full month’s worth of Ukraine war-period data. But despite the disruption in global energy markets triggered by the conflict, on a monthly basis, the U.S. petroleum balance actually improved sequentially, from a $2.94 billion deficit to a $1.58 billion surplus on a pre-inflation basis (the trade flow gauges from these monthly government releases that are most widely followed)

And even on an inflation-adjusted basis, February’s $8.73 billion oil deficit shrank to $5.15 billion in March.

Second, don’t blame inflation much at all. The Census Bureau doesn’t report after-inflation service trade results on a monthly basis, but it does provide this information for goods (which comprise the great majority of U.S. trade flows). And the March figures show that before factoring in inflation, the goods trade deficit worsened by 18.89 percent from $107.78 billon in February to a new record $128.14 billlion, whereas when inflation is counted, this gap widened on month by 18.86 percent, from $115.96 billion in February to $137.83 billion in March. (Major trade wonks will note that these goods and services data are presented according to two different counting methods, but trust me: the difference in results is negligible.)

Third, don’t blame China. The March pre-inflation goods deficit with the People’s Republic was up sequentially from $42.26 billion to $47.37 billion (12.10 percent). But neither that absolute level nor the rate of increase was anything out of the ordinary, much less a record. In fact, the monthly percentage increase was just half the rate of that of the shortfall for total non-oil goods (a close worldwide proxy for China goods trade) – which hit 24.06 percent. One big takeaway here: the Trump China tariffs are still exerting a major effect, along of course with the supply chain knots Beijing has created with its over-the-top Zero Covid policy.

But regardless of where the blame lies, (and it looks like major culprits are continued strong U.S. spending on both consumer goods and capital equipment, combined with an improvement of the supply chain situation outside China), all-time highs and worsts abounded in the March trade report, include worsenings at record paces.

The combined goods and services trade deficit jumped on-month by 22.28 percent, to $109.80 billion. That total was the third straight record for a single month and the increase the fastest since the 43.71 percent explosion in March, 2015 – a month during which much of the country was recovering from severe winter weather.

As mentioned above, the $128.14 billion goods trade gap was the highest ever, too, topping its predecessor (January’s $108.60 billion) by 17.99 percent. As for the 18.89 percent monthly increase, that was also the biggest since March, 2015 (25.18 percent).

Even a seeming trade balance bright spot turns out to be pretty dim. The headline number shows the service trade surplus improving by 1.96 percent – from $17.98 billion to $18.34 billion. Unfortunately, nearly all of this increase stemmed from a big downward revision in the initially reported February surplus, from $18.29 billion.

As known by RealityChek regulars, the aforementioned non-oil goods trade deficit can also be called the Made in Washington trade deficit – because by stripping out figures for oil (which trade diplomacy usually ignores) and services (where liberalization efforts have barely begun), it stems from those U.S. trade flows that have been heavily influenced by trade policy decisions.

And not only was the March Made in Washington deficit’s monthly increase of 24.06 percent the second fastest ever (after March, 2015’s 31.24 percent). The March, 2022 level of $128.70 billion was the biggest ever.

The story of the non-oil goods trade gap’s growth was overwhelmingly a manufacturing story. The sector’s huge and chronic trade shortfall shot back up from $106.49 billion in February (which was a nice retreat from January’s $121.03 billion) to a new record $142.22 billion. And the monthly percentage jump of 33.55 percent was the biggest since the 37.62 percent during weather-affected March, 2015.

Manufactures exports advanced sequentially by a strong 20.53 percent this past March. That topped the previous all-time monthly high of $105.37 billion (set back in October, 2014), by 8.15 percent. But the much greater volume of imports skyrocketed by 27.43 percent. And their $256.18 billion total smashed the old record of $222.79 billion (from last December) by 14.98 percent.

Within manufacturing, U.S. trade in advanced technology products (ATP) took a notable beating in March, too. The $23.31 billion trade gap was an all-time high, and its 73.65 percent monthly growth the worst since the shortfall slightly more than doubled on month in March, 2020 – as the Chinese economy and its huge electronics and infotech hardware manufacturing bases reopened after the People’s Republic’s initial pandemic wave.

Yet as noted above, despite these extaordinary manufacturing and ATP trade numbers, the latest March numbers for manufacturing-heavy U.S. China trade were anything but extraordinary. U.S. goods exports to the People’s Republic increased on-month by 15.36 percent – slower than the rate for manufactures exports globally, but the fastest rate since the 52.47 percent rocket ride they took  last October.

Goods imports from China, however, rose much more slowly from February to March than manufactures imports overall – by just 12.10 percent, from $42.26 billion to $47.37 billion.

When it comes to other major U.S. trade partners, the March American goods deficit with Canada of $8.03 billion was the highest such total since July, 2008 ($9.88 billion). It was led by a 30.81 percent advance in imports reflecting the mid-February reopening of bridges between the two countries that had been closed due to CCP Virus restrictions-related protests.

The goods deficit with Mexico worsened even faster – by 35.11 percent, to $11.92 billion. That total was its highest since August, 2020’s $12.77 billion.

Another major monthly increase (31.59 percent) was registered by the U.S. goods shortfall with the European Union, but its March level ($16.87 billion) was subdued relative to recent results.

Anything but subdued was the Japan goods shortfall, which shot up sequentially in March by 49 percent. The $6.77 billion total also was the biggest since November, 2020’s $6.78 billion, and the monthly jump the greatest since the 84.37 percent burst in July, 2020, during the rapid recovery from the sharp U.S. economic downturn induced by the first wave of the CCP Virus and related economic and behavior curbs.

The Europe and Japan trade figures stem significantly from a development that’s bound to turn into an increasingly formidable headwind for the U.S. trade balance for the foreseeable future – the dollar’s rise versus other leading currencies to levels not seen in 20 years. And unless it’s reversed substantially soon, China’s latest currency devaluation, which began in mid-April, will weaken the effects of both the Trump tariffs and the Zero Covid policy. So even if the Federal Reserve’s (so far modest) inflation-fighting efforts do slow the American economy significantly, it’s likely that, as astronomical as the March trade deficits were, we ain’t seen nothin’ yet.

Making News: Back on National Radio Tonight to Talk Bringing Back Manufacturing…& More!

Tags

CBS Eye on the World with John Batchelor, China, Financial Times, Gordon G. Chang, inflation, John Batchelor, Making News, manufacturing, reshoring, supply chains, tariffs, Trade, trade deficit

I’m pleased to announce that tonight I’m scheduled to be back on the nationally syndicated “CBS Eye on the World with John Batchelor.” The segment is slated to begin at 11:15 PM EST, but every night’s entire program is well worth your while, and starts each week night at 9 PM.

Tonight, John, co-host Gordon G. Chang, and I will focus on recent remarks by a Wall Street big-wig claiming that manufacturing supply chains can’t be brought back to the United States from China for many years – suggesting of course that the attempt shouldn’t even be made.

You can listen live on-line here and, as usual, if you can’t tune in, the podcast will be posted as soon as it’s on-line.

In addition, RealityChek‘s work on the real deal with trade, tariffs, and inflation was cited in this Financial Times column on Sunday.

And keep checking in with RealityChek for news of upcoming media appearances and other developments.

(What’s Left of) Our Economy: Trade-Wise, the New U.S. GDP Report Reveals the Worst of All Worlds

Tags

currency, dollar, exchange rates, exports, GDP, goods trade, gross domestic product, imports, inflation, inflation-adjusted growth, real GDP, real trade deficit, services trade, trade deficit, {What's Left of) Our Economy

The U.S. economy’s quarterly shrinkage in the first quarter of this year that U.S. government data just revealed – the first such inflation-adjusted decline since the darkest days of the CCP Virus pandemic in the second quarter of 2020 – was led by leaps and bounds by a soaring and all-time record quarterly U.S. real trade deficit.

Even as the gross domestic product (GDP – the chief measure of the economy’s size) fell sequentially in price-adjusted terms by 1.42 percent at annual rates, the after-inflation trade gap swelled to a record $1.5417 trillion by the same measure. In other words, the trade deficit and growth arrows are moving in the worst possible combination of ways.     

This ballooning reduced real GDP in the first quarter by 3.20 percentage points – the biggest such subtraction in absolute terms since the 3.25 percentage point loss recorded in the third quarter of 2020 (when the economy was rapidly recovering from the deep downturn induced by the first CCP virus wave).

Had the price-adjusted trade deficit simply stayed the same in the first quarter, the economy would have actually expanded by 1.78 percent at annual rates.

Moreover, this soaring constant dollar trade deficit’s hit to growth was the greatest since the second quarter of 1982, when the shortfall’s sequential surge reduced growth by 3.22 percentage points as the economy shriveled by 1.53 percent after inflation. And for good measure, the quarterly swing in the trade deficit’s effect on growth (from a 0.23 percentage point subtraction) was the greatest in absolute terms since that first pandemic recovery between the second and third quarters of 2020 – when the impact changed from a 1.53 percentage point boost to growth to a 3.25 percentage point contraction.

The first quarter’s record trade deficit was the seventh straight, and the 14.19 percent sequential widening was the biggest since the 31.81 percent jump between the second and third quarters of 2020 – again, when the economy was bouncing back rapidly from that pandemic-induced cratering, not contracting. In fact, these latest GDP figures revealed the first time that both the economy shrank and the trade deficit grew since the first quarter of 2020 – when the virus’ economic impact was first starting to be felt.

At least as bad, at 7.81 percent of real GDP in the first quarter, the relative size of the inflation-adjusted trade deficit blew past the old record of 6.82 percent – set in the previous quarter. Since the fourth quarter of 2019, the final quarter before the CCP Virus began impacting the U.S. economy significantly, the overall inflation-adjusted trade gap is up by fully 81.89 percent.

Nor did the all-time and multi-month worsts stop with the total real trade deficit.

The first quarter real goods trade deficit of $1.6685 trillion annualized was the seventh straight record and the 13.65 percent increase over the fourth quarter tota was the biggest sequential rise since the 20.40 percent between the second and third quarters of 2020 – during that early pandemic recovery. Since the CCP Virus era began, the after-inflation goods trade shortfall has worsened by 55.73 percent.

The firist quarter’s services trade surplus of $120.9 billion annualized was actually slightly higher than the fourth quarter’s $120.1 billion, and represented the third straight quarter of improvement. The absolute level, moreover, was the highest since the $152.4 billion recorded in the second quarter f 2021. But since the fourth quarter of 2019, the services surplus is down by 44.46 percent, reflecting the uusually hard virus-related blows this portion of the economy has suffered.

Inflation-adjusted combined goods and services exports dipped by 1.51 percent on quarter – from an annualized $2.3906 trillion to $2.3545 trillion. The drop was the fourth in the nine quarters since that first pandemic-affected first quarter of 2020. On a quarterly basis, total U.S. constant dollar exports are down 7.79 percent since the last pre-pandemic fourth quarter of 2019.

Yet total imports achieved their fifth straight quarterly record, reaching $3.8963 trillion in real terms at annual rates. The 4.16 percent sequential increase was only slightly smaller than the 4.21 percent rise in the fourth quarter of last year. These imports are now 14.57 percent greater than they were in the immediate pre-pandemic fourth quarter of 2019.

Goods exports sank by 2.50 percent on quarter, from an after-inflation $1.793 trillion at annual rates to $1.7482 trillion. The sequential drop was also the fourth in the nine quarters since the pandemic first arrived in the United States and the biggest since the 23.08 percent collapse in the second quarter of 2020. Quarterly goods exports have now decreased by 1.92 percent since the fourth quarter of 2019.

Constant dollar goods imports grew by 4.77 percent in the quarter, from $3.2611 trillion annualized to a second consecutive record of $3.4167 trillion. The increase was the third in a row, and its rate was the fastest since the 6.80 percent for the fourth quarter of 2020. On a quarterly basis, these overseas purchases have surged by 19.72 percent since just before the pandemic struck in force.

Real services exports climbed 0.94 percent sequentially in the first quarter, from $627.7 billion at annual rates to $633.6 billion. This second straight advance propelled these sales to their highest absolute level since the first quarter of 2020’s $695.3 billion. At the same time, quarterly-wise, inflation-adjusted services exports have plummeted 18.11 percent from immediate pre-CCP Virus levels.

Real services imports rose one percent sequentially in the first quarter, and the increase from $507.6 billion to $512.7 billion annualized sent them to their highest level since that immediate pre-pandemic fourth quarter of 2019. But these results still left these purchases 6.27 percent below that $547 billion annualized number.

And the lousy trade news doesn’t seem likely to stop, even if U.S. economic growth continues to under-perform because of multi-decade high inflation, Federal Reserve efforts to tame it by slowing the economy via monetary policy tightening, and ongoing supply chain disruptions due to China’s Zero Covid policy and the Ukraine War.

The main reasons? First, growth overseas is much more vulnerable to supply chain issues than American growth, and all else equal, relative U.S. economic strength will surely pull in more imports and crimp exports. Second, as of today, the U.S. dollar’s recent rise has brought the greenback to its highest level in twenty years, which will increase the cost of American exports versus the global competition and decrease the cost of U.S. imports versus the domestic competition. And finally, the Biden administration has been dropping broad hints that it will cut tariffs on many imports from China before long – ostensibly to help fight inflation.

(What’s Left of) Our Economy: A February Reprieve from Lousy U.S. Trade News

Tags

CCP Virus, Census Bureau, China, coronavirus, COVID 19, Federal Reserve, goods trade, inflation, manufacturing, monetary policy, non-oil goods trade deficit, oil, services trade, trade deficit, Ukraine-Russia war, Wuhan virus, {What's Left of) Our Economy

It wouldn’t be accurate to start off this post with a statement on the order of “As bad as the full-year 2021 inflation-adjusted trade figures released last week were, the new pre-inflation data for February were good.” But a contrast was unmistakable, with yesterday’s latest monthly report from the Census Bureau containing some decidedly encouraging news – even though the numbers were pre-Ukraine war, and therefore pre- all the disruption to global supply chains – in particular in the food and energy sectors – that the conflict has already brought.

And the story even begins at the beginning. The combined goods and services trade deficit decreased sequentially for the first time since October. The slippage was only 0.05 percent, and the monthly total ($89.19 billion) was still the second highest ever (behind January’s $89.23 billion). But that January figure itself was revised down 0.52 percent.

Goods trade produced somewhat better results. February’s shortfall of $107.47 billion represented its first monthly drop since October, and the decrease was 1.04 percent. The February goods trade gap was the second biggest on record, too, but January’s $108.60 billion mark was downgraded by 0.24 percent.

When it comes to the broadest trade balance results, the only black mark was found in the service sector. In February, its long-time surplus shrank for the second straight month, decreasing by 5.62 percent, from $19.37 billion to $18.29 billion. That total was the smallest since November’s $18.30 billion. At least the January number was revised up by 1.05 percent.

More good news came on the export front. Total American sales abroad climbed 1.84 percent on month to $228.63 billion – a new record that nosed ahead of the previous all-time high (December’s $228.35 billion) by 0.12 percent.

Goods exports were up to on a monthly basis in February – by 1.79 percent, to $158.78 billion. That total was the second highest ever – 0.15 percent below October’s $159.02 billion.

Services exports improved, too in February. At $69.85 billion, they were 1.96 percent higher than January’s $68.51 billion. But reflecting the outsized hit this sector took from the CCP Virus and related lockdowns and behavioral changes, these totals remain below pre-pandemic levels.

Combined goods and services imports set their seventh straight monthly record in February, increasing 1.30 percent from $313.72 billion in January to $317.81 billion. The January total, however, was revised down by 0.12 percent.

Goods imports alone lengthened their string of monthly records, too, in February, with its $266.25 billion total topping January’s $264.59 billion by 0.63 percent. Their January total was downgraded fractionally.

The biggest relative imports increase came in services, where February’s $51.57 billion in purchases from abroad represented a 4.95 percent jump from January’s $49.13 billion. And the February total marked an all-time high – beating November’s $50.49 billion by 2.14 percent.

Oil was responsible for the overall February trade figures not being considerably better. The petroleum deficit soared by $2.67 billion on month, from a miniscule $115 million to $2.78 billion – the highest.monthly total since September’s $3.37 billion. And this surge was led by an 18.57 percent increase in oil imports. The monthly total of $23.11 billion, moreover, was the highest since December, 2014’s $25.01 billion.

Much higher prices per barrel of oil bought obviously deserve the blame for much of this news. But even adjusting for inflation, U.S. oil imports for February increased by 4.31 percent – the biggest relative rise since last May’s 6.47 percent.

In line with the improvement in the overall February trade deficit, the non-oil goods shortfall fell by 3.43 percent on month in February. At $103.56 billion, this deficit – which RealityChek regulars know covers the trade flows most affected by U.S. trade policy – was still the second highest on record, after January’s $107.24 billion. But the decrease was the first since October. And it resulted from the ideal combination of both a rise in exports and a decline in imports.

This ideal combination also encouragingly appeared in the February data for two long-term (and related) problem areas in U.S. trade flows – manufacturing and China.

The chronically huge American manufacturing trade gap shrank in February by 12.01 percent – from a record $121.03 billion to $106.49 billion. The decrease was the third straight and the biggest percentage-wise since the 12.70 percent plunge in November, 2019. In addition, the new level the lowest since April, 2021’s $103.60 billion.

As indicated, moreover, manufacturing exports were up on month in February – by 2.40 percent, from $92.33 billion to $94.55 billion. The increase, however, did follow a 7.80 percent sequential decrease in January that brought these foreign sales to their lowest level since last August.

Manufacturing imports, though, decreased for the third straight month – by 5.78 percent, from $213.36 billion to $201.03 billion. The monthly drop was the biggest in percentage terms since February, 2021’s 6.98 percent (amid the CCP Virus’ powerful second wave), and the new February total was the lowest since last April’s $198.06 billion.

America’s trade with China is dominated by manufactures, so it’s not surprising that its also chronically huge goods surplus with the United States plummeted by 15.69 percent sequentially in February, from $36.37 billion to $30.67 billion. This nosedive was the greatest in percentage terms since the 25.19 percent of February, 2020, when the Chinese economy was still seized up by sweeping CCP Virus-induced lockdowns.

Just as important, this monthly cratering was more than 4.5 times bigger than the monthly drop in the U.S. global non-oil goods deficit – the closest worldwide proxy for U.S.-China goods trade. It’s the latest evidence of the Trump tariffs’ effectivness at keeping enormous amounts of Chinese products out of the U.S. market.

As for the new February U.S.-China goods deficit’s level, it was the lowest since last July’s $28.65 billion.

And goods exports to and goods imports from China moved in exactly the right ways from an American standpoint. The former edged up 1.04 percent, from $11.48 billion to $11.59 billion – a performance that snapped a three-month losing streak. But the latter dropped for the second straight month, by 11.68 percent, from $47.85 billion to $42.26 billion. Decreases in imports from China are typical in post-holiday season February, and this latest drop-off was the biggest in percentage terms since last February’s 13 percent.

All the same, as promising as these February trade results are, one month’s worth of data alone reveal nothing about longer term trends and possibilities. And as mentioned at the outset, the Ukraine war impact is yet to be recorded. Further, more major changes may be in store in the U.S. and global economies, especially as the Federal Reserve is sounding more determined than ever to cool torrid inflation dramatically even if it means slowing growth dramatically. (Unless the central bank chickens out, if only because of the unmistakably political impact such tightening would have during an election year?) And as if all this uncertainty wasn’t enough, never forget that the trade figures are just about the most lagging-y set of indicators that the federal government releases.

So as with so many other dimensions of the U.S. economy, meaningful clarity on trade flows looks unlikely to emerge until the impacts of external shocks like the CCP Virus and the Ukraine war wear off.  That day will come at some point, won’t it?   

P.S. Yes, because my own schedule this past week has been disrupted nearly as much as the economy these last few years, this is my latest effort to catch up on reporting on recent economic releases.  More to come! 

 

(What’s Left of) Our Economy: With or Without Inflation, Last Year Was Awful for U.S. Trade

Tags

exports, GDP, gross domestic product, imports, inflation, real GDP, real trade deficit, Trade, trade deficit, {What's Left of) Our Economy

This entry represents my first effort to catch up on U.S. economic data released while I was on jury duty last week, and will cover the latest inflation-adjusted trade figures – which carry the story though the fourth quarter of last year and therefore the full year, and seem to me especially important because inflation has been so much hotter lately than what Americans have gotten used to for decades.

At the same time, the big picture they draw is very similar to that created by the full-year 2021 pre-inflation trade figures, which came out February 8: Last year was lousy in record terms for America’s trade flows, even if a few reasons for optimism can be seen.

The lousy records start with the annual price-adjusted total trade deficit: At $1.2843 trillion, the 2021 level was the second straight yearly all-time high. And the 36.24 percent increase over 2020’s $942.7 billion was the biggest since 1999’s 47.97 percent (when the much smaller absolute numbers made such huge relative increases much easier to generate).

The fourth quarter of 2021 was even more record-y. Its $1.3501 trillion annualized total was the sixth straight quarterly record. But at least the sequential rise of 2.54 percent was far from a record. In fact, it was downright modest compared with the 5.79 percent quarterly increase in the third quarter, the 8.24 percent sequential rise registered in the first quarter, much less the 31.81 percent burst of the second quarter of 2020, when the economy was rebounding so strongly from the sharp downturn caused by the CCP Virus’ first wave and related lockdowns and behavioral curbs. That’s the greatest jump in nearly 40 years – since the 33.82 percent in the third quarter of 1983 (when again, the absolute numbers were much smaller.

Viewed in context, moreover, the price-adjusted trade deficit picture is equally bad. As a share of after-inflation gross domestic product (GDP – the standard measure of a national economy’s size) the real trade deficit reached 6.61 percent – breaking the old record of 6.14 percent set in 2005.

On a quarterly basis, the fourth quarter of 2021’s constant dollar trade deficit of 6.76 percent of constant dollar GDP was a new all-time high as well, eclipsing the 6.43 percent of the first quarter.

Moreover, these figures aren’t just of academic interest. The real trade deficit’s year-on-year surge chopped 1.40 percentage points off of 2021’s annual growth. In other words, rather than the 5.67 percent recorded, the economy would have expanded by 7.07 percent. That’s the biggest loss in absolute terms since the trade shortfall’s increase reduced inflation adjusted growth by 1.54 percentage points in 1984.

In addition, the 2021 annual increase in the trade deficit’s subtraction from real growth in absolute terms – from 0.29 percentage points in 2020 – was the biggest since trade turned from a supporter of growth in 1949 (by 0.08 percentage points) to a subtractor of 1.28 percentage points in 1950.

Relatively speaking, though, the 2021 trade bite from growth looks just slightly better. It’s only the biggest since the deficit’s increase reduced 2015’s 2.71 percent price-adjusted GDP growth by 0.78 percentage points, or 28.78 percent.

In quarterly terms, however, the impact of the trade deficit’s increase on after-inflation growth looks better still. Whereas this increase chopped 1.26 percentage points off the sequential real GDP improvement of 2.28 percent at an ainnual rate in the third quarter of last year, it subtracted only 0.23 percentage points from the much stronger sequential 6.72 percent annualized advance in the fourth quarter .

Regarding the components of the inflation-adjusted trade deficit, total real exports in 2021 were up 4.53 percent – the fastest pace since the 12.88 percent jump in 2010, as the economy was recovering from the Great Recession that followed the 2007-08 global financial crisis. But the $2.3075 trillion amount was still 9.71 percent below the all-time high of $2.5556 trillion, achieved in 2018.

Last year’s after-inflation total imports, however, did set a new record. At $3.5919 trillion, they topped 2020’s $3.1503 trillion level, by 14.02 percent and the old (2019) mark of $3.5492 trillion by 1.20 percent. The latest annual growth rate, moreover, was the greatest since they soared 24.34 percent in 1984 – when, again, the absolute levels were much smaller.

On a quarterly basis, the $2.3906 trillion annualized in combined goods and services exports for the last three months of last year represented a 5.17 percent rise from the third quarter’s $2.2730 trillion. The improvement was the fastest since the fourth quarter of 2020’s 5.20 percent, but the total was 6.81 percent below the record of $2.5653 trillion, from the first quarter of 2019.

Total imports for that fourth quarter, though, were the fourth straight all-time high. At $3.7408 trillion, they bested the previous quarter’s by 4.21 percent.

The final catch-up item: The February inflation rates according to the Federal Reserve’s preferred gauge – which were issued last Thursday. Hoping I can report on them tomorrow – but life sure has taken some interesting turns lately!

(What’s Left of) Our Economy: A Rough January for U.S. Trade

Tags

Advanced Technology Products, ATP, China, goods trade, Made in Washington trade deficit, manufacturing, non-oil goods deficit, Russia, services trade, tariffs, Trade, trade deficit, Ukraine, Ukraine invasion, Ukraine-Russia war, {What's Left of) Our Economy

As known by RealityChek readers, yesterday I decided to put off finishing my normal same-day report on the new official monthly U.S. trade figures in order to spotlight some critical (and oddly neglected) developments in the Ukraine war/crisis.

But the trade results (for January) are still worth examining in detail, even though (as always), they’re lagging indicators, and even though they of course pre-date all the likely disruption to the global economy and U.S. trade flows seemingly sure to stem from the Russian invasion of Ukraine and ensuing conflict.

Notably, the combined goods and services trade gap hit its second straight monthly record in January, rising 9.43 percent sequentially, to $89.69 billion. Moreover, the deterioration came on virtually all key fronts. And the December total was revised up by a big 1.52 percent, from $80.73 billion to $81.96 billion.

The January goods deficit increased, too and hit its third consecutive record. The increase was 6.99 percent, from an upwardly revised $101.75 billion to $108.86 billion.

Meanwhile, the longstanding U.S. surplus in services, which has been considerably depressed by a CCP Virus pandemic that’s hit this sector particularly hard the world over, sank by 4.40 percent, from $19.79 billion to $19.17 billion. The sequential decrease came to 3.13 percent, the decline was the first since August, and the downward revision of the initially reported December level was a huge 4.40 percent.

Total exports fell on month for the first time since September – by 1.73 percent, from an upwardly revised and all-time high of $228.35 billion to $224.40 billion.

Goods exports dipped, too, and also for the first time since September. The decline was 1.47 percent, from a downwardly revised $158.21 billion to $155.89 billion.

As for services exports, they sagged by 2.32 percent, from an upwardly revised $70.14 billion to $68.51 billion. This decline was the first since August.

Overall imports climbed by 1.04 percent, from an upwardly revised $310.30 billion to $314.09 billion, and they hit their sixth monthly record in a row.

Goods imports rose 1.84 percent, from an upwardly revised $259.96 billion to $264.75 billion, and achieved their fifth consecutive all-time high.

Services imports in January, however, decreased month-to-month for the second time in a row – which hasn’t happened since January and February, 2021. The fall-off was 2.01 percent, from an upwardly revised $50.35 billion to $49.34 billion. That latter total was the lowest since August, and the December revision was a substantial 2.38 percent.

As known by RealityChek regulars, non-oil goods trade is the vast portion of U.S. trade flows heavily affected by America’s trade deals and other trade policy decisions – hence my monicker “Made in Washington” trade. (Trade liberalization in services remains at an early stage globally, and oil is rarely on the table in national trade policy-making or diplomacy.)

The export-import gap in this category hit its third straight record in January, widening by 6.55 percent, from $100.56 billion to $107.15 billion.

Non-oil goods exports sank sequentially by 1.72 percent, from $138.38 billion to $136.00 billion, while imports set their fifth straight record. They increased by 1.76 percent, from $238.94 billion to $243.14 billion.

The nation’s oil trade gap soared on a relative basis in January – nearly quadrupling on a pre-inflation basis (the same gauge used for all the numbers in RealityChek trade reports unless specified otherwise). But the January total of $426 million was tiny in absolute terms.

The two big (but modest) exceptions to the January pattern of expanding trade shortfalls came in manufacturing and Advanced Technology Products (ATP).

The former’s chronic and mammoth trade deficit actually retreated for the second straight month in January. The decline was 1.32 percent – from December’s $122.65 billion to $121.03 billion. But the new total was still the third highest ever.

Manufacturing exports plunged by 7.80 percent on month in January, from $100.14 billion to a $92.33 billion level that was the lowest monthly total since August’s $97.13 billion.

Industry’s imports shrank by 4.23 percent in January, from a record $222.79 billion to $213.36 billion – the lowest since September’s $211.33 billion.

The decrease in the January ATP trade deficit was 1.77 percent, from $19.80 billion to $19.45 billion, and the drop was the second in a row – a first since last June and July.

ATP exports plummeted in January from a record $34.46 billion to $29.65 billion. That 13.96 percent drop was the biggest such figure since the 16.55 percent nosedive in January, 2020 – as the pandemic was raging through and locking down China. And the January figure was the lowest since August’s $29.49 billion.

ATP imports were off significantly, and from a record, too. The December-January swoon of 9.66 percent, from $54.36 billion to $49.11 billion, was the biggest since last February’s 13.09 percent, and brought these purchases to their lowest level since last August’s $45.56 billion.

The enormous U.S. goods deficit with China was up in January, but by just 0.61 percent sequentially, from $36.15 billion to $36.37 billion. The increase was much smaller than that for non-oil goods (the closest global proxy for U.S.-China trade) – and adds to the evidence (see most recently here) that the Trump China tariffs have helped rein in this trade gap. But the monthly level was the highest since December, 2018’s $36.60 billion.

U.S. goods exports to China, however, decreased in January for the third consecutive month – by 14.27 percent, from $13.38 billion to $11.47 billion. That drop, moreover – to the lowest level since last September’s $10.91 billion – illustrates again, how short the Trump Phase One trade deal with China keeps falling of its targets.

U.S. goods imports from China declined as well in January – by 3.41 percent, from $49.53 billion to $47.85 billion. That shrinkage was the first since last April, and brought the monthly total to its lowest level since September’s $47.41 billion.

Since, as noted, these January trade figures predate the invasion of Ukraine (as will February’s), future prospects are especially murky.  So the wisest course of action seems to be holding off on the prognostication and focusing on data as it comes out until some clarity emerges – at least until the next next global shock.   

(What’s Left of) Our Economy: The Fatally Flawed Claims that Trump’s China Trade Policies Flopped

Tags

China, Donald Trump, European Union, non-oil goods trade deficit, Phase One, tariffs, Trade, trade deficit, trade war, {What's Left of) Our Economy

With charges of spreading misinformation and false narratives in the air once again (not that it’s been entirely absent at any point in recent years), I’d be remiss if I didn’t spotlight a major example of the latter in particular) that’s appeared in the last week or so concerning former President Trump’s Phase One trade deal with China.

Since two years have now passed since Phase One officially went into effect, claims have mushroomed in the Mainstream Media that it’s been a complete failure. (See, notably, here, here, and here.) These claims aren’t new, and they’re not all bunk. For example, it’s true that the Chinese have fallen well short of importing as many U.S. goods as promised. But conspicuously missing in these analyses is the larger and much more important truth that the Trump China trade policies writ large have spurred major progress toward a central declared objective – bringing under control the ginormous American merchandise trade deficit with the People’s Republic.

As known by RealityChek readers, during the 2020-2021 period that represents the only full year period since Phase One began, the U.S. goods trade shortfall with China rose by 14.52 percent. The closest global proxy, the U.S. non-oil goods deficit, was up 15.66 percent. And the U.S. performance doubtless would have been considerably better had decades of neglect of health security by pre-Trump presidents not forced the nation to import massive amounts of personal protective equipment and other CCP Virus-related medical goods from China.

Moreover, since China’s first year (2002) as a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO), through 2019, the U.S. merchandise deficit with China increased by 234.07 percent. During that same period, the U.S. non-oil goods gap increased by 122.99 percent. So under Trump, a trend that had lasted nearly two decades was reversed – to China’s detriment. And clearly, the stiff tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars worth of Chinese products imposed by the former President – which were left completely intact under Phrase One – deserve major credit.

In addition, as reported in the Financial Times on Tuesday, between 2020 and 2021, the European Union’s (EU) merchandise deficit with China ballooned by 36 percent. That’s nearly 2.5 times more than the widening of the U.S.-China gap. And although Beijing lacks unfettered entry into the EU market, Brussels has erected nothing like the Trump tariffs to slow imports from China. In other words, EU trade with China is a clear control group for U.S. trade with China, and the latter dramatically outperformed. 

It’s legitimate of course to claim that bilateral trade deficits don’t matter, and that the trade war conducted by Trump harmed the nation on net (although the evidence is shaky or non-existent when it comes to metrics like output and employment in the trade-heavy U.S. manufacturing, or inflation in the overall economy).

But arguing that Trump’s China trade policy had no effect on U.S.-China trade flows or the China trade gap, or left the former President’s goals on this front unmet, says nothing useful about the state of bilateral commerce, but speaks volumes about the biases of the critics.

Following Up: Podcast Now On-Line of National Radio Interview Grading Trump’s China Trade Policy

Tags

CBS Eye on the World with John Batchelor, China, Donald Trump, Following Up, John Batchelor, tariffs, Trade, trade deficit, trade war

I’m pleased to announce that the podcast of my interview last night on the nationally syndicated “CBS Eye on the World” with John Batchelor is now on-line.

Click here for a timely discussion of whether former President Trump’s 2020 trade deal with China – which has now been in effect for two years – and broader strategy for grappling with the People’s Republic on trade really was the flop so many critics continue to claim – or even close.

And keep checking in with RealityChek for news of upcoming media appearances and other developments.

(What’s Left of) Our Economy: No Great Reset Yet in the Makeup of U.S. Trade

Tags

aerospace, Boeing, CCP Virus, computers, coronavirus, COVID 19, exports, facemasks, Great Reset, healthcare goods, imports, jewelry, masks, personal protective equipment, phamaceuticals, pharmaceuticals, PPE, semiconductor manufacturing equipment, semiconductor shortage, semiconductors, stay at home economy, Trade, trade deficit, trade surplus, vaccines, Wuhan virus, {What's Left of) Our Economy

Throughout the CCP Virus period, I’ve refrained from posting on detailed, industry-by-industry trade figures. My reasoning? Pandemic distortions rendered them all but meaningless in terms of what they revealed about the fundamentals of U.S. trade flows and in particular the competitiveness of domestic manufacturing.

Of course, now it looks reasonable to suggest that the pandemic is ending – or at least that the end might really be in sight this time. So I spent some of my weekend comparing the trade flow details from 2019 (the last full pre-pandemic year) with those of 2021 (the last full data year, and whose figures have just been released). And the results surpised the heck out of me. Because if you look at trade deficits and surpluses and how they’ve changed, the best description seems to be surprisingly little.

To start, let’s check out the twenty sectors of the economy that have racked up the biggest trade surpluses in 2019 and 2021. They’re presented below according to the categories created by the U.S. government’s North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), which has become official Washington’s main system for slicing and dicing the U.S. economy. To the right of the actual dollar figure (in billions), you’ll find its rank for that particular year.

And for data junkies, these groupings are those at NAICS’ sixth level of disaggregation – one I like because in many cases it permits distinguishing between final products and the parts and components that make them up. Since for decades, so much U.S. and global trade today takes place in those inputs (because the manufacturing process has become so fragmented because creating complex worldwide supply chains became a premier business model), this distinction has mattered crucially in understanding trade flows.

                                                      2019                             2021

civil aircraft & parts:               $125.953   1                 $79.510   1

natural gas:                                $21.823   4                 $54.923   2

soybeans:                                   $18.493   6                 $27.110   3

other special class provns:         $24.499   3                 $27.019   4

petroleum refinery products:      $30.583  2                 $26.245   5

waste and scrap:                         $13.065  7                 $21.362   6

plastics meterials and resins:     $18.803   5                 $18.771   7

corn:                                             $7.620  11               $18.674    8

semiconductor machinery:          $1.408  43                $11.971   9

semiconductors/related devices: $5.994  14                $10.326  10

non-anthracite coal/petroleum gas:  $9.312  8              $9.250   11

used/second hand merchandise:  $8.805  10                 $8.604  12

non-poultry meat:                        $7.364  12                 $7.898  13

wheat:                                          $5.898  15                 $6.891  14

motor vehicle bodies:                  $9.201  9                   $6.886  15

cotton:                                         $6.225  13                  $5.789  16

copper, nickel, lead, zinc:           $4.402  18                 $5.471   17

tree nuts:                                     $5.096  16                 $4.712   18

prepared/preserved poultry:        $3.745  20                $4.554   19

misc basic inorganic chemicals: $4.169  19                $4.081   20

Some reshuffling of the order of these biggest trade flow winners has taken place. Most stunningly, semiconductor manufacturing equipment jumped from the industry with the forty third widest trade surplus in 2019 to number nine in 2021. Computer parts was in 17^th place in 2019 and fell all the way to 52d place (and out of the Top Twenty) in 2021. And motor vehicle bodies dropped from number nine to number 15. But otherwise, the two lists look remarkably similar. In fact, the seven biggest trade surplus industries of 2019 were also the seven biggest in 2021, though the order changed sllghtly.

What has seen much more major change during this two-year period have been the absolute numbers themselves, and these movements do seem pandemic related, though in different ways. Commodities like natural gas and corn (and to a lesser extent, wheat) appear to have been dramatically affected by inflation.

Trade in semiconductors and the machines that make them clearly reflect the increased importance of the “stay at home economy” – both in terms of leisure and the workplace. (The skyrocketing of the semiconductor machinery surplus, however, is also a reminder of how many of the world’s semiconductors are made outside the United States these days – although the microchip industry has also been decidedly cyclical for many years).

Meanwhile, the nosedive in the aerospace surplus has of course resulted from the woes of Boeing, both because of the CCP Virus-related global slump in air travel, and the company’s own manufacturing and safety problems.

Did this pattern repeat for the twenty sectors that ran the biggest trade deficits in those two years? Here are those lists, with the actual figures again in the billions of dollars:

autos & light duty vehicles:    -$126.272  1                -$96.250   1

goods returned from Canada:    -$91.240  2               -$96.124   2

broadcast & wireless comms equip:  -$72.231  3       -$80.075   3

computers:                                 -$59.443  6                -$79.209   4

crude petroleum:                        -$62.006  5                -$63.495  5

pharmaceutical preparations:     -$62.236  4                -$63.477  6

female cut & sew apparel:         -$42.088  7                -$41.028  7

audio & video equipment:         -$22.184  12               -$34.349   8

male cut & sew apparel:            -$30.889   8                 -$29.851  9

misc motor vehicle parts:           -$23.242  11               -$29.055  10

dolls, toys & games:                  -$17.285   14              -$26.789   11

printed circuit assemblies:         -$16.709   16              -$26.588   12

iron & steel & ferroalloy:          -$16.954   15              -$26.294   13

footwear:                                    -$25.597  10              -$26.037   14

major household appliances:      -$14.128  19              -$20.849   15

misc plastics products:                -$12.886 20              -$20.566   16

jewelry & silverware:                   -$3.476  68             -$17.819   17

motor vehicle electrical equip:   -$14.418  17             -$16.151   18

curtains & linens:                       -$12.134   22             -$15.256   19

aircraft engines & engine parts: -$25.670   9               -$14.070   20

The patterns revealed on this list closely resemble those made clear from the Top Twenty surplus list – some reshuffling but – with just a few exceptions like jewelry and silverware, (Home Shopping Network lines burning up?), and aircraft engines and engine parts – little major change. Indeed, the order of the top three hasn’t changed a bit, and as with the biggest trade surplus sectors, the makeup of the top seven is identical (though the order has been slightly modified).

As with the big surplus winners (though on the consumption side, not the production side), the advent of the “stay at home economy” is evident from the large increases in the absolute trade deficits for computers and audio and video equipment (though not so much for the broadcast and wireless gear category, which contains cell phones).

The damage done by the worldwide semiconductor shortage can be seen in the dramatically lower motor vehicle trade deficit. And aerospace woes come through loud and clear from the even steeper drop in the aircraft engines deficit.

Another take on the trade balance figures is provided by examining the sectors where trade balances have improved the most (either because surpluses have expanded or because deficits have shrunk), and worsened the most (either because surpluses have shrunk or deficits expanded). Below are the biggest trade balance “improvers” by percentage change among the sectors that have either run the fifty biggest trade surpluses or the fifty biggest trade deficits. The sectors with “deficit” to the right of the percentage change are those where trade shortfalls declined.

miscellaneous grains:                                     +1,021.72 percent

semiconductor manufacturing equipment:        +750.18 percent

Jewelry and silverware:                                     +412.65 percent   deficit

sawmill products:                                               +270.45 percent   deficit

storage batteries:                                                +168.67 percent   deficit

natural gas:                                                         +151.67 percent

corn:                                                                   +145.07 percent

surgical appliances & supplies:                          +134.60 percent   deficit

sporting & athletic goods:                                    +86.13 percent   deficit

artificial/synthetic fibers/filaments:                     +74.73 percent   deficit

semiconductors/related devices:                          +72.28 percent

small electrical appliances:                                  +71.87 percent   deficit

waste and scrap:                                                    +65.50 percent

animal fats/oils/byproducts :                                 +63.15 percent

motor vehicle steering &suspension & parts:       +60.49 percent   deficit

misc plastics products:                                          +59.60 percent   deficit

printed circuit assemblies:                                    +59.13 percent   deficit

cooling, heating, & ventilation equipment:          +55.91 percent   deficit

dolls, toys, & games:                                            +54.86 percent   deficit

audio & video equipment:                                    +54.84 percent   deficit

One trend that should jump out right away: Thirteen of the twenty sectors that have improved their trade balances the most are still in deficit – which reflects the nation’s continuing huge trade gap.

Since some of the greatest changes in the order of sectors with the biggest trade deficits and surpluses have come in pandemic-related sectors, it’s not surprising that such industries are prominent on the list of improvers. Hence the appearance of semiconductors and their manufacturing equipment, and commodities like miscellaneous grains, corn, and natural gas.

As for sawmill products, their results owe largely to U.S. lumber tariffs. In sporting and athletic goods, can the deficit’s shrinkage be due to a pandemic-y dropoff in physical activity?

Totally puzzling, though – the improvement in electrical appliances and audio and video equipment, where so much production has migrated overseas in recent decades, and because imports of the latter would seem to have jumped to serve so much of the stay-at-home demand.

But on the encouraging side – the big decrease in the trade deficit in surgical appliances and supplies, which includes all the personal protective equipment (like facemasks, gloves, and medical gowns) that have figured so prominently in the nation’s pandemic response, along with ventilators.

Now the twenty major sectors whose trade balances have worsened the most:

oil & gasfield machinery:                                  +54.65 percent

aircraft engines & engine parts:                         +45.23 percent   deficit

civilian aircraft, engines, & parts:                      +36.87 percent

railroad rolling stock:                                         +35.04 percent

turbines & turbine generator sets:                      +33.09 percent

non-diagnostic biological products:                   +31.84 percent   deficit

in-vitro diagnostic substances:                           +31.10 percent

cyclic crude & other intermediate chemicals:    +31.05 percent

guided missiles & space vehicles:                      +30.07 percent

fibers, yarns, & threads:                                     +29.32 percent

motor vehicle bodies:                                          +25.16 percent

paper bags/coated & treated paper:                    +23.26 percent

autos & light duty vehicles:                               +23.78 percent   deficit

petroleum refinery products:                              +14.19 percent

misc animal foods:                                              +10.35 percent

aircraft:                                                                  +9.98 percent   deficit

paints & coatings:                                                  +9.07 percent

tree nuts:                                                                +7.54 percent

cotton:                                                                    +7.00 percent

male cut & sew apparel:                                        +3.36 percent   deficit

Interestingly, although the nation’s huge and chronic trade deficits means that many more industries run them than surpluses, fifteen of the twenty sectors listed above as leading trade deficit losers are surplus industries. So during the pandemic period so far, their surpluses have shrunk. Moreover, the degree of shrinkage has only been kept relatively low because the surpluses weren’t that big to begin with.

For the aforementioned reasons, the aerospace cluster is well-represented among the big deficit losers. But it’s strange that, during the pandemic so far, the U.S. trade shortfall in the non-diagnostic biologic products category that contains vaccines has gone way up.

Overall, however, the weaker export performance even among big U.S. net export winners points to the global economic slump that’s been created by the CCP Virus and the curbs on business and personal activity it’s spawned – which have combined to drag down growth abroad, in U.S. export markets, more than at home. But the remarkably stable makeup of U.S. surpluses and deficits strongly suggests that any new post-virus normal in American trade will strongly resemble the old one.

(What’s Left of) Our Economy: A Record Number of Records in U.S. Trade II

Tags

Advanced Technology Products, ATP, Biden, CCP Virus, China, coronavirus, COVID 19, Donald Trump, Federal Reserve, goods trade, interest rates, Made in Washington trade deficit, manufacturing, monetary policy, non-oil goods trade deficit, services trade, tariffs, Trade, trade deficit, trade war, Wuhan virus, {What's Left of) Our Economy

Just because yesterday’s first RealityChek post on the U.S. government’s latest official trade data focused on all the monthly records set by the December monthly results doesn’t mean that the annual figures for 2021 were lacking in all-time highs and lows – and for the same CCP Virus-related reasons.

So let’s get to them – and conclude with some needed context. For as known by RealityChek readers, isolated data don’t tell all the story, or even the most important part of the story. And the big takeaway from examining the context is that in a surprising number of ways, 2021 looked pretty ordinary trade-wise.   

For now, though, let’s start by noting that last year’s combined goods and services trade deficit hit a record $859.13 billion – the second straight all-time high, and a 26.96 percent jump from 2020’s $676.68 billion.

But don’t think that annual increase was in a class by itself. Far from it. Here are the first bits of context: As recently as 1998 and 1999, the total trade gap widened by 53.45 percent and 53.97 percent, respectively. In 1984 and 1993, the figures were 88.82 percent and 79.31 percent, respectively.

Further, in 1983, the trade shortfall more than doubled (surging by 139.14 percent), and in1972 and 1977, it more than quadrupled. In addition, three times during the 1970s, the trade balance switched from surplus to deficit, and in the 1960s, major drops in the surplus occurred.

Even so, it’s crucial to remember that during these periods, oil and its price changes were major chunks of U.S. trade flows and deficits. Big rises in the dollar’s value have also often contributed substantially to big past increases in the trade shortfall. And never forget that the absolute numbers were much smaller then, so large percentage changes were much easier to generate.

Still, the trade deficit’s growth last year ranks as pretty impressive. Ditto for the fact that unlike was the case for decades, it’s largely unrelated to oil (although the small $13.98 billion surplus in this sector turned into an $8.44 billion deficit).

Speaking of oil’s role in U.S. trade, as known by RealityChek regulars, it matters in part because it’s rarely the subject of trade deals and other trade policy decisions. In fact, stripping out from U.S. trade flows oil and services (where liberalization efforts have made relatively little progress) yields the statistics for non-oil goods – the trade flows that are heavily influenced by U.S. trade policy.

And 2021 represented the seventh straight year of record deficits in this “Made in Washington” trade account. Moreover, the $1.06993 trillion level topped 2020’s by 15.66 percent. This increase, though, impressive as it was, was well short of the biggest in history, too (in a series going back to 1992). That dubious distinction goes to 1993’s 76.63 percent, but as recently as 2015, the Made in Washington deficit was climbing at a 21.23 percent annual rate.

Last year’s goods trade gap of $1.09068 trillion was the second straight all-time high and an 18.29 percent widening from 2020’s $922.03 billion. Again, however, the all-time worst is orders of magnitude higher (227.86 percent in 1977), and all the aforementioned influences and qualifiers apply. But as recently as 2010 (another first year of recovery following a steep economic downturn), the goods deficit was up 27.27 percent on year.

The $231.55 billion surplus in U.S. services trade was no record, either, but it was the lowest annual total since 2012’s $215.21 billion, reflecting how hard this sector has been hammered by the pandemic and the economic policy and behavior curbs it’s spawned.

In terms of trade flows closely followed by RealityChek, the huge and chronic deficit in manufacturing soared by 19.23 percent year-on-year in 2021, from $1.11527 trillion to $1.32977 trillion. The shortfall was an eleventh straight annual record and the fourth consecutive year it topped the trillion-dollar mark. The annual increase was high by recent standards, but smaller than 2010’s 27.90 percent.

The Advanced Technology Products (ATP) category saw its fifth straight record annual deficit, and the $197.16 billion total was 3.13 percent above 2020’s $191.18 billion.

The also huge and chronic U.S. goods trade deficit with China was up 14.52 percent on year in 2021, from $310.26 billion to $355.30 billion. Not only was this figure well below the record $418.23 billion set in 2018, but the annual increase was slower than in the non-oil goods deficit – which indicates that the sweeping and often steep Trump administration tariffs on imports from the People’s Republic have been having their intended effects.

Total U.S. exports grew by a healthy 18.46 percent on year in 2021, from $2.13444 trillion to $2.52854 trillion. But they’re still below the all-time high of $2.53864 trillion, set in 2018.

Goods exports were up on year in 2021, too – by 23.32 percent, from $1.42880 trillion to $1.76197 trillion, but also remain lower than their peak – the $1.67691 trillion also achieved in 2018.

The hard hit services industries managed an 8.63 percent annual improvement in exports in 2021, from $705.64 billion to $766.50 billion. But they still remain 12.52 percent shy of their record of $876.30 billion, set in 2019.

Non-oil goods exports rose to an all-time annual high of $1.55849 trillion in 2021 – a figure 20.42 percent higher than 2020’s $1.29421 trillion. But they’re also short of a 2018 record ($1.49101 trillion).

Domestic manufacturing boosted its exports even faster last year – by 18.91 percent, from $953.02 billion to $1.13325 trillion. But it’s all-time high of $1.19227 trillion dates from way back in 2014!

Despite ATP overseas sales advancing by a nearly as strong 18.57 percent, in 2021, from $300.78 billion to $356.62 billion, they’re still below their record, too – 2018’s $368.63 billion.

U.S. goods exports to China were 21.35 percent higher in 2021 than in 2020 – rising from $124.49 billion to $151.07 billion. The growth rate of 21.35 percent was slightly higher than that for global proxy non-oil goods – a likely result of former President Trump’s 2020 Phase One trade deal.

Arguably more impressive, it was the fastest such growth since the 32.25 percent hit in 2010, when the United States was recovering from the Great Recession. (The best performance in U.S. goods exports to China came way back in 1988 – 43.59 percent – when the absolute numbers of course were tiny.)

The nation’s import figures continued the string of trade flow records. Combined goods and services imports of $3.38767 trillion were an all-time high, and grew 20.51 percent over 2020’s $2.81113 trillion. They also blew past the previous peak of $3.11959 trillion, set in 2018.

Stronger growth (21.35 percent) was registered by goods imports, which expanded from $2.53083 trillion to $2.82565 trillion. The previous high – which also came in 2018 – was $2.55566 trillion.

In services, annual import growth was just 16.23 percent in 2021 – rising from $460.30 billion to $535.02 billion. The yearly record for these purchases was 2019’s $591.12 billion,

The record story remained intact in non-oil goods imports. These increased from $2.21934 trillion to $2.62842 trillion – an 18.43 percent growth rate. The previous all-time high for these imports was 2018’s $2.31086 trillion.

Imports in manufacturing reached their own record in 2021 – $2.64303 trillion. That surpassed 2018’s previous all-time high of $2.17711 trillion and topped 2020’s $2.06829 trillion level by 19.09 percent.

For ATP, annual imports advanced by 12.52 percent in 2021 – from $491.96 billion in 2020 to $553.78 billion. The previous record was just $496.06 billion, also set in 2018.

And Americans bought $506.37 billion worth of goods from China in 2021. That topped 2020’s $434.75 billion total by 16.47 percent, but was considerably short of 2018’s record $538.51 billion and the growth rate was slower than that for global proxy non-oil goods – likely another effect of the Trump tariffs that have been largely maintained by President Biden.

But true to the truth that context is crucial, let’s return to that methodology. The main context for last year’s record trade deficits is their size compared with that of the entire economy. And here, in particular, 2021 doesn’t look like such a trade disaster.

Specifically, the combined goods and services deficit as a share of total gross domestic product (GDP) in pre-inflation dollars (to produce apples-to-apples results) came to 3.74 percent in 2021. That’s a big jump from 2020’s 3.24 percent. But it’s not only lower than the record 5.53 percent of 2006, but than the 5.50 percent of 2005, the five percent of 2004, the 4.91 percent of 2007, the 4.82 percent of 2008, and the 3.85 percent of 2002.

Nor is the 2021 growth rate of 15.43 percent in this share unheard of – or even close. For example, during the first calendar year of the economy’s recovery from the Great Recession, in 2010, it was up by 22.34 percent. And between 1999 and 2000, it soared by 35.71 percent. (The growth rate was twenty percent in also pandemic distorted 2020.)

The same goes for the goods deficit as a share of GDP. Last year it was 4.74 percent – a 7.48 percent increase from 2020’s 4.41 percent. But the 4.74 percent figure has been exceeded no fewer than six times going back to 1999 alone. And the growth rate has been topped by 2011’s 10.21 percent, 2010’s 22.44 percent, 2005’s 10.29 percent, 2004’s 15.01 percent, 2003’s 8.74 percent, 2002’s 9.02 percent, and 2000’s 24.57 percent (the 21^st century record), along with 9.43 percent in pandemic-distorted 2020.

The Made in Washington trade deficit as a share of GDP did hit a 21^st century record in 2021 – 4.65 percent. And before 2020’s 4.43 percent, the next highest such figure was 2005’s 4.17 percent. But here, too, the 2021 growth rate in the deficit as a share of GDP of 4.97 percent is ordinary. Leaving aside 2020’s 13.30 percent, it’s been bested no fewer than nine times since 2000, including the record 18.84 percent in 2010.

As a result, it’s not entirely unreasonable to approach 2022 with some trade optimism. Big wild cards remain – mainly how the CCP Virus evolves, how effective the U.S. and global responses become, the future of those China tariffs, and Federal Reserve’s upcoming decisions on interest rates and bond-buying – which could greatly influence the economy’s growth rate.

But if there’s a case that even with all the virus-related distortion and massive government stimulus, the U.S. trade numbers were held in check last year, there’s one that even better results may soon start appearing.