Our So-Called Foreign Policy: Totally Unhinged Establishment Thinking on Taiwan

Tags

Asia-Pacific, China, East Asia, foreign policy establishment, Indo-Pacific, investment, Our So-Called Foreign Policy, semiconductors, Seth Cropsey, Taiwan, tech, The Wall Street Journal, Trade

Because semiconductors are already central to America’s security and prosperity and will only become more important with each passing day, wouldn’t it be great if the United States wasn’t so dependent on Taiwan for supplies – especially of cutting-edge chips – given that the island is located just 100 miles from China?

According to Seth Cropsey, one of America’s most respected military experts and a former national security official, the answer is “No” – because if the United States became much more self-sufficient in semiconductor manufacturing, it wouldn’t have to care so much about…Taiwan.

His January 26 Wall Street Journal article is a wonderful example of a syndrome I’ve long written about (most recently here in the Taiwan context) – the tendency of the U.S. foreign policy establishment, and too many U.S. leaders who have listened to its members’ advice, to use foreign policy measures to solve problems much better dealt with through domestic policy moves whenever possible.

The advantages of using domestic policy should be screamingly obvious. As I’ve also previously pointed out (most recently at length here), American policymakers will almost always have much more control over developments within our borders than without. And when it comes to Taiwan-like situations, rebuilding the nation’s capacity to manufacture semiconductors per se carries absolutely no risk of war with a nuclear-armed China.

What’s particularly bizarre about this Cropsey op-ed is that he completely overlooks two eminently reasonable arguments for concentrating tightly on Taiwan’s security, at least for the time being. The first is one I strongly agree with – regaining the semiconductor prowess the United States needs will take many years. So until then, it’s imperative – and in fact in my opinion vital – that America take whatever steps are needed to prevent China from taking over Taiwan, which it regards as a renegade province that it’s vowed to reabsorb by force if necessary. After all, it should be easy to see how Beijing either could win access to Taiwan’s crucial, world-leading production technology, or deny the United States (and the rest of the world) access to the huge volumes of chips that Taiwan’s factories turn out.

The second argument absent from his column – and which I don’t agree with – is that irrespective of the semiconductors, if China gained control over Taiwan, it would take a huge step toward becoming the kingpin of East Asia, perhaps the world’s most economically dynamic regions, and limit or cut off U.S. access to crucial markets and sea lanes.

I disagree for two reasons. First, leaving the semiconductors out of the picture, the chronic and huge trade deficits run up by the United States with the region show that doing business with East Asia has been a longtime major net loser for America’s domestic economy. Second, and also putting semiconductors aside, East Asia has relied for so long on amassing trade surpluses, especially with the United States, to achieve adequate growth that its countries (including China) simply can’t afford such decoupling.

As I just made clear, opponents of my position can cite valid concerns. But Cropsey never mentions them. Instead, he’s simply worried that the Biden administration’s focus on rebuilding America’s own semiconductor manufacturing mean that Washington “looks to be playing for time—not time to rearm and prepare for a fight, but to reduce Taiwan’s importance to the U.S.” and that this would harm U.S. interests because “An America that no longer needs Taiwanese semiconductors [would be able to]abandon its old friend.”

I admire Taiwan’s economic, technological, and political achievements as much as anyone. But even overlooking the enormous extent to which Taiwan’s massive investments in China’s technology industries (just like America’s) have shortsightedly helped create and magnify the very threat the island faces, the idea that honoring a friendship only for its own sake is remotely as important as minimizing the odds of a nuclear war is just loony. And nothing exempifies the nature of too much American foreign policy discussion for decades as well as a major newspaper’s belief that such arguments deserve to be taken seriously.

Advertisement

(What’s Left of) Our Economy: New Official Manufacturing Output Figures Add to Recessionary Gloom

Tags

aerospace, aircraft, aircraft parts, appliances, automotive, computer and electronics products, electrical components, electrical equipment, Federal Reserve, furniture, inflation-adjusted growth, machinery, manufacturing, medical supplies, pharmaceuticals, plastics and rubber products, printing, real growth, semiconductors, transportation equipment, wood products, {What's Left of) Our Economy

Yesterday’s Federal Reserve report on U.S. manufacturing production (taking the story through November) tells me that domestic industry’s inflation-adjusted output is rolling over into contraction – and not just because it fell last month for the first time since June. As I’ll spotlight below, it was also disturbing to see multi-month worsts in industries where such output has been remarkably stable lately, and sequential drops in some other sectors that were the biggest since the peak of the CCP Virus pandemic’s hit to the economy in April, 2020.

Production in real terms by U.S.-based manufacturers sagged by 0.62 percent sequentially last month – the first negative read since June’s 0.73 percent drop. Oddly, though, revisions of recent months’ results were slightly to the upside, although hardly stellar.

Still, as a result, since February, 2020, just before the pandemic struck the U.S. economy in force, such manufacturing production is up by 3.07 percent, versus the 3.76 percent calculable last month.

November’s manufacturing output losses were so broad-based that only four of the twenty broad industrial subsectors tracked by the Fed registered any sequential growth at all. They were:

>wood products, which grew by 3.59 percent in price-adjusted terms despite the continuing troubles of the housing industry. Indeed, that was the best such result since March, 2021’s 3.71 percent. But the November increase came after an October decrease of a downwardly revised 3.58 percent that was wood products’ worst month since constant dollar production plunged by 11.02 percent in April, 2020. wave. Other revisions were overall negative, too, but the November pop means that after-inflation wood products output is now up by 0.20 percent since immediately pre-pandemic-y February, 2020, versus being 2.67 percent below calculable last month:

>printing and related support activities, which enjoyed its second straight sequential real output improvement after difficult summer and fall. The sector’s 1.58 percent advance in November followed one of an upwardly revised 2.75 percent in October that was the best such figure since February’s 3.13 percent jump. Other revisions were mixed on balance but the recent growth spurt has brought the industry’s price-adjusted output to within 7.92 percent of its February, 2020 levels versus the 9.37 percent calculable last month; 

>aerospace and miscellaneous transportation equipment, which produced constant dollar production growth of 1.15 percent. Slightly positive revisions helped the sector push its post-February, 2020 output expansion to 26.37 percent in real terms, versus the 26.29 percent> calculable last month; and

>computer and electronics products, where inflation-production production was 0.53 percent higher in November than in October. Yet decidedly negative revisions helped push this diverse category’s real expansion since February, 2020 down to 5.70 percent, versus the 6.32 percent calculable last month.

The biggest November losers among the great majority of broad manufacturing sub-sectors seeing drooping after-inflation production were:

>automotive, whose volatility has shaped so much of manufacturing’s recent fortunes. November’s constant dollar output sank on month by 2.84 percent, the worst such result since February’s 3.81 percent tumble. Revisions were mixed but inflation-adjusted production of vehicles and parts is now 0.46 percent lower since just before the CCP Virus struck in force, versus being 3.18 percent higher as of last month.

>electrical equipment appliances and components, where output slipped 2.41 percent in November. – another post-April, 2020 worst. In addition, an initially reported October increase of 1.92 percent, which was the best such result since February’s 2.29 percent, was downgraded to 0.68 percent. Other revisions were negative as well, which dragged down this diverse sector’s after-inflation growth since February, 2020 all the way down to 2.83 percent, versus the 7.07 percent calculable last month;

>furniture, which experienced a 2.02 percent real output decrease that represented its worst such result since February, 2021’s 2.77 percent. Revisions were negative overall, and in real output terms the furniture industry is now 7.31 percent smaller than in immediately pre-pandemic-y February, 2020 versus the 4.80 percent calculable last month; and

>plastics and rubber products, whose 1.84 percent price-adjusted output slip was another worst since the 18.63 percent nosedive in peak pandemic-y April, 2020. Along with mixed revisions, the November drop depressed real plastics and rubber products output to 0.66 percent below February, 2020 levels versus having been 1.18 percent above as of last month.

The machinery sector is a major bellwether for the rest of domestic U.S. manufacturing and the entire economy because its products are so widely used. In November, its real output dipped for the first time (by 0.23 percent) since June’s 1.94 percent fall-off. Revisions were slightly negative, and inflation-adjusted production of machinery is now 7.53 percent greater than just before the CCP Virus’ arrival in force in February, 2020, versus 8.31 percent calculable last month.

The shortage-plagued semiconductor industry has also been key to domestic manufacturing’s fortunes, and will be receiving mammoth subsidies soon due to Congress’ passage of legislation aimed at boosting its American footprint. So November’s 0.39 percent real output expansion is good news, especially since it was the first increase since June’s 0.79 percent. Revisions were mixed, leaving constant dollar semiconductor output up 12.40 percent since February, 2020, versus the 12.16 percent calculable last month.

Since the pandemic struck, RealityChek has been paying special attention to several other manufacturing sectors that have either been especially hard hit by the pandemic, or that have been especially important in fighting it. Overall, they experienced downbeat Novembers in terms of production.

The exception was aircraft and parts, whose companies were hit so hard by the CCP Virus-related curbs on travel. In November, these companies boosted their after-inflation output by another 1.85 percent. Moreover, October’s initially reported gain of 2.51 percent was upgraded to one of 2.59 percent (the best such performance since April’s 3.01 percent). Other revisions were negative, but inflation-adjusted output in this sector is now 35.82 percent higher than just prior to the pandemic’s arrival in force, versus the 34.14 percent calculable last month.

The pharmaceutical and medicines industry (including vaccine makers) saw real production down by 0.16 percent, the first decline since June’s 0.50 percent. But revisions were positive enough (especially for October) to bring this sector’s real output 18.11 percent above February, 2020’s levels versus the 16.71 percent calculable last month.

Inflation-adjusted production slid by 1.55 percent after inflation for the medical equipment and supplies firms that turn out so many products used to fight the virus. This drop was another instance of a worst such result since peak pandemic-y April, 2020 (15.08 percent). Revisions were mixed, and real output in these industries is still up 13.23 since just before the pandemic. But as of last month, this figure was 15.75 percent.

It’s of course entirely possible that these dreary November manufacturing output results are blips, and that the sector will keep shrugging off bearish predictions. But with U.S. growth seemingly certain to slow down markedly at the least, and global growth already weak, it’s difficult to understand how domestic industry escapes these undertows.

Making News: Back on National Radio Tonight on Apple and China, & a New Podcast On-Line

Tags

Apple, CBS Eye on the World with John Batchelor, CCP Virus, China, coronavirus, COVID 19, decoupling, Employment, friend-shoring, Jobs, Making News, Market Wrap with Moe Ansari, recession, subsidized private sector, supply chains, Zero Covid, Zero Covid protests

I’m pleased to announce that I’m scheduled to be back tonight to the nationally syndicated “CBS Eye on the World with John Batchelor.” Our subject – an update to Saturday’s report on Apple’s potentially game-changing decision to move production out of China at a faster pace. 

I don’t know yet when the pre-recorded segment will be broadcast but John’s show is on between 9 PM and midnight EST, the entire program is always compelling, and you can listen live at links like this. As always, moreover, I’ll post a link to the podcast as soon as one’s available.

Speaking of podcasts, the recording is now on-line of yesterday’s interview on the also-nationally syndicated “Market Wrap with Moe Ansari.” The segment focused on my post yesterday on the worsening quality of many of America’s newly created jobs, the political and economic impact of Chinese protests against the regime’s Zero Covid policy, and the latest signs of an impending U.S. recession.

To listen, click here, and scroll down a bit till you see my name on the left.  The segment begins at about the 21:30 mark.

And keep on checking in with RealityChek for news of upcoming media appearances and other developments.

Those Stubborn Facts: NATO Chief Pushes Hopium on Members’ Defense Spending

Tags

defense spending, national security, NATO, North Atlantic treaty Organization, Those Stubborn Facts

“NATO allies may decide to aim to spend more on defence than their current target of 2% of national output when they meet for their next summit in Vilnius in July 2023, the chief of the alliance said on Monday.”

– Reuters, November 21,2022

 

Number of NATO members that have met the target today: 8 of 30

Date the target was set: 2006

 

(“NATO allies may lift target to spend 2% of output on defence – Stoltenberg,” by While Europeans learn energy frugality, Reuters.com, November 21, 2022, https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/nato-allies-may-lift-target-spend-2-output-defence-stoltenberg-2022-11-21/ and “Majority of NATO Nations Fail to Spend 2 Percent GDP Guideline for Defense,” by Jake Thomas, Newsweek, March 31,2022, Majority of NATO Nations Fail to Spend 2 Percent GDP Guideline for Defense (newsweek.com))

(What’s Left of) Our Economy: U.S. Manufacturing Dispels Recession Fears

Tags

aircraft, aircraft parts, apparel, automotive, CCP Virus, computer and electronics products, coronavirus, Federal Reserve, inflation-adjusted growth, machinery, manufacturing, medical equipment, miscellaneous durable goods, non-metallic mineral products, paper, personal protective equipment, petroleum and coal products, pharmaceuticals, PPE, printing, recession, semiconductors, Wuhan virus, {What's Left of) Our Economy

If the U.S. economy is still in recession, or getting uncomfortably close to one, it seems no one’s told the nation’s manufacturers. Yesterday’s latest figures from the Federal Reserve show that domestic industry expanded its inflation-adjusted output by 0.43 percent on month in September. Moreover, revisions at this 30,000-foot level were modestly positive (as opposed to some for manufacturing sectors which, as you’ll see, were pretty dramatic).

August’s initially reported gain of just 0.09 percent – which seemed to indicate that the sector was heading into a downturn – is now judged to have been one of 0.38 percent. July’s originally reported 0.72 percent advance was revised down slightly again – from 0.62 percent to 0.60 percent. And June’s results were downgraded a third straight time – from an initially reported dip of 0 05 percent to a drop of 0.58 percent.

These new and revised figures pushed real U.S. manufacturing production is up 4.19 percent from 2020 – just before the CCP Virus and assorted mandated and voluntary behavioral curbs sparked a short but scary downturn and touched off waves of distortion that persist to this day. As of last month’s Fed report, industry’s inflation-adjusted production had risen by 3.49 percent during the pandemic period.

Among the broadest manufacturing sub-sectors tracked by the Fed, the biggest September winners in terms of after-inflation output were:

>apparel and leather goods, whose monthly constant dollar output jumped 1.56 percent. Revisions, moreover were strongly positive. August’s initially reported 0.53 percent downturn was lowered to a slump of 1.85 percent. But July’s results rebounded from a 1.46 percent gain to one of 1.66 percent, after having been revised down from 1.60 percent.

And get a load of the June figures! The initially reported 1.44 percent drop was revised to a boom of 6.09 percent (which would have been the best such increase since August, 2020’s 8.04 percent), then back down to a rise of just 1.46 percent, and finally (for now) back up to a 5.98 percent advance.

Apparel and leather goods’ real output is now 5.39 percent higher than in immediately pre-pandemic-y February, 2020, versus the 4.98 percent calculable last month;

>non-metallic mineral products, where inflation-adjusted production was up 1.41 percent for these companies’ best month since May’s 1.69 percent. Revisions, though, were moderately negative, with August’s initially reported 0.09 percent monthly dip being downgraded to a drop of -0.22 percent; July’s initially reported 0.52 percent increase revised down to a slip of 0.09 percent to a fractional decline; and June’s initially reported 1.07 percent fall-off significantly upgraded to a 0.48 percent increase, then revised down to growth of 0.46 percent, to a fractional decrease.

Still, price-adjusted output in non-metallic mineral products is now 1.48 percent higher than just before the CCP Virus arrived in force, versus the 0.12 percent calculable last month;

>petroleum and coal products, which grew inflation-adjusted output by 1.13 percent in September, and which saw overall positive revisions. August’s initially reported 3.54 percent is now judged to be an advance of 4.13 percent (the strongest since March, 2021’s 11.49 percent). July’s initially estimated 0.94 percent decrease has now been upgraded first to one of 0.25 percent and now to one of 0.23 percent. And June’s results stayed at a significantly downgraded 2.80 percent tumble.

Real output in these sectors is now 3.20 percent higher than in February, 2020, versus the 1.45 percent calculable last month; and

>computer and electronics products, whose constant-dollar production climbed 1.07 percent – now the best growth since February’s 1.20 percent. Yet revisions were negative, as August’s initially reported increase of 1.27 percent (which had been the best since May, 2021’s 2.44 percent) has been downgraded to one of 1.05 percent; July’s initially reported drop of 0.65 percent downgraded to one of 0.68 percent and now to one of 0.89 percent; and June’s results settling in at a 0.45 percent increase after the initially reported 0.21 rise was upgraded to 0.67 percent and then revised down to 0.46 percent.

After inflation production in these industries is now 6.78 percent higher than in that last pre-CCP virus data month of February, 2020 versus the 6.11 percent calculable last month.

September’s biggest price-adjusted growth losers were:

>printing and related support activities, where real output sank by 1.67 percent – its worst such perfomance since January’s 2.09 percent retreat. Just as bad, revisions were negative on net. August’s initially reported 0.27 percent decrease was revised up all the way to a 0.59 percent gain, but July’s loss is now judged to have been 1.60 percent after having been upgraded from on of 1.67 percent to one of 1.50 percent. And June’s initially reported 1.68 increase (then the best such performance since February’s 3.13 percent advance) has been revised since to a decrease of 0.51 percent, 0.40 percent, and 0.41 percent.

Conseqently, this hard-hit sector’s output is 11.81 percent smaller than in February, 2020, versus the 11.02 calculable last month.

>miscellaneous durable goods, the broad category that includes the personal protective equipment and other medical devices used so widely to fight the CCP Virus. Its inflation-adjusted production fell by 1.29 percent in September – the first decrease since March’s fractional dip. Even better, this decline comes off overall positive revisions of already excellent results.

August’s initially reported 1.71 percent increase is now estimated to have been one of 2.86 percent the – best since growth rate since July, 2020’s 5.96 percent, as the economy recovered from the pandemic’s first wave and medical equipment production was prioritiezed. July’s initially reported 1.23 percent improvement was downgraded to one of 0.89 percent and then back up to 0.95 percent, and June’s initially reported 2.25 percent growth stayed at a downwardly revised 0.67 percent following a downgrade to 0.87 percent.

Still, in constant dollar terms, production in this broad category is now 13.78 percent greater than in immediately pre-pandemic-y February, 2020, versus the 13.92 percent calculable last month; and

>paper, where real output in September sank by 0.92 percent. Revisions were mixed, with August’s initially reported 0.80 percent increase (the best such performance since February’s 2.26 percent jump) revised down to 0.69 percent; July’s initially reported 0.64 percent decrease upgraded for a second time, to one of 0.58 percent and now to 0.51 percent; and June’s numbers following a similar pattern, with an initially reported shrinkage of 0.88 percent revised up to losses of 0.62 percent and 0.57 percent, respectively.

Yet paper’s real output is now down by 3.78 percent since just before the pandemic arrived, versus the 2.83 percent worse calculable last month.

Good Septembers were also recorded in two manufacturing sectors of long-time special importance to the economy.

Machinery’s economic role is critical because of how widely its products are used throughout the economy and because its output largely reflects business’ expectations of future demand and growth. So it was good news that this diverse sector’s constant dollar output rose by 0.32 percent in Sept, and that revisions were positive on net.

August’s initially reported 0.99 percent increase (mistakenly reported in my last post as 0.91 percent), which had been the best such growth since April’s 1.97 percent was upgraded all the way up to 2.64 percent! That’s now the best production month since July, 2021’s 2.76 percent. This July’s initially reported 0.50 percent growth was upgraded again – from 0.68 percent to 0.78 percent – but June’s data has been revised down overall from a drop of 1.49 pecent to one of 1.27 percent, and back down to 1.75 percent and 1.83 percent.

These developments have now pushed up machinery’s post-February, 2020 real output to 7.23 percent, versus the 5.07 percent calculable last month.

The automotive sector has greatly influenced the manufacturing production statistics throughout the pandemic era, and its volatility continued in September, with after-inflation output up by one percent. Yet that result followed an August whose production decrease was revised down from 1.44 percent to one of 1.48 percent; a July whose output increase was downgraded from an initially reported 6.60 percent to one of 3.24 percent and now back up to 3.57 percent; and a June whose results have changed from -1.49 percent to -1.27 percent to -1.31 percent to -1.84 percent.

Real vehicle and parts production, however, is now back in the black since February, 2020, now aving risen by 0.89 percent, versus the 0.89 percent slippage calculable last month.

The news also was generally good in September for industries prominent in the news during the CCP Virus era.

Constant-dollar production in the shortage-plagued semiconductor sector rose by 0.45 percent, and revisions overall were mixed. August’s initially reported decline of 0.57 percent (the first in three months) is now judged to have been only 0.39 percent. July’s initially reported 1.16 percent growth has been revised down to 0.77 percent and now a measly 0.02 percent. But June’s initially reported 0.18 percent advance is now judged to have been one of 0.86 percent, after being revised way up to 2.09 percent, and then back down to 0.88 percent.

Real semiconductor production is now 17.29 percent higher since February, 2020, versus the 17.46 percent improvement calculable last month.

Inflation-adjusted production of aircraft and parts grew 0.59 percent in September, and revisions were mixed. August’s initially reported 3.11 percent surge (the best since January, 2021’s 8.61 percent) was downgraded significantly to 1.69 percent. But July’s numbers have been upgraded from an initially reported gain of 1.02 percent to one of 1.52 percent and now to one of 1.90 percent. And June’s initially reported 0.26 percent growth has been revised to a 0.18 percent advance, back up to a rise of 0.24 percent, and again to one of 0.56 percent.

Aircraft and parts production, therefore, has now increased by 31.18 percent since just before the pandemic’s arrival, versus the 30.60 percent rise calculable last month.

Pharmaceutical and medicines companies boosted their real monthly production by 0.64 percent in September, and revisions were mixed. August’s initially reported 1.62 percent improvement (the best since August, 2021’s 1.96 percent) was upgraded to 1.81 percent. But July’s initially reported 0.29 percent increase, which had been revised up to 0.30 percent, is now judged to have been a 0.55 percent loss – the first such setback since February’s 1.35 percent fall). And June’s results have gone from 0.39 percent to unrevised to a gain of 0.32 percent and now a rise of 0.43 percent.

As of last month, phamaceuticals’ and medicines’ after-inflation production level had grown by 16.56 percent since February, 2020.  Now the figure is 16.58 percent.

The lone exception to these good September results was medical equipment and supplies – where the personal protective devices and other pandemic fighting equipment is found. Its 1.33 percent after-inflation production fall-off last month was its first since last December (0.71 percent) and the worst such performance since the 15.08 percent crash dive in April, 2020 – at the height of the CCP Virus’ devastating first wave.

But August’s initially reported three percent increase was revised up to 4.40 percent – the best such result since July, 2020’s 9.84 percent. This July’s initially reported 1.90 percent rise was downgraded to 1.58 percent but then upgraded to 1.69 percent. And although June’s figure was revised down from an initially reported 3.12 percent to 1.01 percent and then to 0.67 percent, it was nudged back up to 0.68 percent yesterday.

These net gains pushed medical equipment and supplies’ real production to 17.95 percent above their February, 2020 levels, versus the 17.81 percent improvement calculable last month.

For what it’s worth, the normally pretty reliable forecasters at the Atlanta branch of the Federal Reserve system believe that the economy has now exited the recession it experienced in the first half of this year, and that will grow at a very respectable 2.9 percent after inflation at annual rates in the third quarter of this year. We’ll find out for sure starting October 27, when the first official read on third quarter growth comes out. But at this point, these new manufacturing production data support the idea that economic expansion is back for the time being – and certainly augur well for domestic industry’s prospects at least for the short term.

Following Up: Podcast Now On-Line of TNT Radio Interview

Tags

abortion, China, conservatism, culture wars, election 2022, electric vehicles, energy, Europe, Following Up, gay marriage, inflation, left-wing authoritarianism, midterms 2022, migrants, national conservatism, National Conservatism Conference, national security, politics, Sanctuary Cities, The Hrjove Moric Show, TNT Radio, Trade, Ukraine War

I’m pleased to announce that the podcast is now on-line of my appearance Tuesday night on “The Hrvoje Moric Show” on the internet network TNT Radio. Click here for a timely discussion on the future of American conservatism, on the culture wars that should and shouldn’t be fought, and a on a wide range of other domestic and international subjects, both strategic and economic.

And keep checking in with RealityChek for news of upcoming media appearances and other developments.

Im-Politic: Welcome Polling News for Immigration Realism

Tags

Biden border crisis, Center for Immigration Studies, Democrats, Gallup, Im-Politic, Immigration, independents, polls, public opinion, Republicans, YouGov

Two sets of poll results sure don’t make a trend. But they’re sure more convincing than one set of poll results. So recent surveys from Gallup and YouGov could signal an encouraging turning point in U.S. public opinion on immigration issues – and one brought about by the epic failure of the Biden administration’s Open Borders-friendly statements and actions.

Gallup’s findings were posted on August 8. The headline development? The share of American adults contacted between July 5 and 26 believing that immigration levels should be decreased stood at 38 percent. That’s the highest level since June, 2016 and up from 31 percent last June. Moreover, the annual percentage- point increase was the biggest since 2008 and 2009 – when the economy was mired in the Great Recession that followed the global financial crisis.

The share of respondents who wanted immigration levels to be decreased or remain the same (69 percent) was also the highest since June, 2016 (72 percent) and up from 66 percent last year.

By an overwhelming 70 percent to 24 percent, Gallup found that Americans agree that “on the whole” immigration is a “good thing” rather than a “bad thing.” But even though this question seems to focus on immigration views in the abstract, with no relation to current conditions, the “good thing” share of responses fell from 75 percent last year, and the “bad thing” responses rose from 21 percent.

In addition, the “good thing” responses represented the lowest percentage of the total since 2014 (63 percent) and the “bad thing” responses the highest since 2016. And the 46 percentage-point margin enjoyed by the “good thing” responses is a drop from last year’s 54 percentage points and the smallest since 2014’s 30 percentage points.

Also striking in the Gallup results: It’s no surprise that the 69 percent of respondents identifying as Republican wanting less immigration is by far the highest total since Gallup began asking these questions (surpassing 2009’s 61 percent). It’s also no great surprise that independent identifiers agreeing with this stance has rebounded lately a bit to 33 percent (though still far below its high of 51 percent in 2002.

But it’s really surprising, especially given their loathing of immigration restrictionist Donald Trump and the growing influence of progessives in the party, that the share of Democratic identifiers supporting less immigration is up from 12 percent last year to 17 percent this year.

The YouGov survey was conducted in late July, and reported that by a 35 percent to 31 percent margin, Americans believed that immigration “makes the country” “worse off” instead of “better off.” According to Andrew Arthur of the Center for Immigration Studies, that’s a huge turnabout from what the same outfit found in September, 2019. Then, “better off” won by 43 percent to 19 percent.

At the same time, this latest YouGov survey found that 31 percent of Americans support increasing legal immigration versus 22 percent who want it reduced. Gallup didn’t draw the (critical) legal/illegal distinction. I don’t know how these results have changed over time. But the sheer size of the discrepancy indicates that even if American opinions are moving their way, it’s still far from certain that restrictionists (who I of course consider to be the adults in the room) have won the day.

(What’s Left of) Our Economy: Are High Prices Starting to Cure Wholesale Inflation, Too?

Tags

consumer inflation, consumer price index, consumer prices, core inflation, core PPI, cost of living, CPI, energy, energy prices, inflation, living standards, PPI, Producer Price Index, productivity, recession, wholesale inflation, wholesale prices, {What's Left of) Our Economy

In Wednesday’s post, I wrote that I was somewhat surprised about the new (and somewhat encouraging) official U.S. data for consumer inflation in July because June’s figures for what’s often called wholesale inflation were so bad. Because when the prices businesses charge each other to turn out the goods and services they sell, they typically compensate by passing these higher costs on to consumers.

But I actually shouldn’t have found those latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) numbers so unexpected. As I’ve pointed out before (e.g., here) such higher costs can be passed along only if consumers go along. So I should have recognized the better (but still far from good) CPI results as a sign that consumers are starting to balk – by cutting back their spending to some extent.

And significantly, yesterday’s official Producer Price Index (PPI) results for July suggest that businesses themselves began protesting higher prices and cutting back on purchases of their own inputs. That is, they may represent another example backing the adage that the best cure for high prices is high prices. 

In fact, in all the important ways, the new figures for both “headline” producer inflation and its “core” counterpart (which strips out energy and food prices supposedly because they’re volatile for reasons having little at best to do with the economy’s fundamental vulnerability to inflation) strongly resembled those for consumer inflation.

Both the headline and core PPI indices barely rose sequentially (reflecting a bit of “price rebellion,” and worsened on annual bases at a pace that was the slowest in many months, but still alarmingly high in absolute terms. Further, as with the CPI, the big reason for this improvement was the drop in energy prices. And both annual CPI and PPI rates remain worrisome because they’re coming off results for the previous year that were also historically torrid.

One prime indicator of how dramatically energy has affected these results comes from the month-to-month headline PPI numbers.

By this measure, producer prices sank by 0.50 percent (yes, “sank” – didn’t just “rise more slowly”) in July– the first such drop since April, 2020 (1.27 percent) when the first wave of the CCP Virus was wreaking its maximum damage on the economy. And this milestone followed a June monthly increase of 1.01 percent. The percentage-point swing between these two figures (1.51) was the greatest on record (though to be fair, this data series only goes back to late 2009).

The evidence for energy’s leading role? The July sequential fall-off of 8.96 percent (the first such decline since last December’s 1.42 percent and the biggest since since the 16.85 percent nosedive in peak pandemic-y April, 2020) came on the heels of June’s 9.41 percent increase – the biggest since June, 2020’s 9.99 percent, as the economy was recovering rapidly from that first virus wave, related lockdowns and other mandated restrictions, and voluntarily reduced activity. In addition, the percentage-point swing of 18.37 was the biggest since the 18.40 shift between the April, 2020 energy price crash and the May, 2020 rebound.

As for core producer prices, they crept up by just 0.15 percent on month in July. That’s the smallest such increase since last December’s 0.17 percent increase. And they displayed little volatility, as the 15 percentage-point difference between June’s rise of 0.32 percent and July’s was exactly the same as that between the June advance and May’s of 0.47 percent.

The annual PPIs tell a similar story of energy price dominance.

Headline producer inflation was up 9.69 percent on a year-on-year basis in July – the lowest such increase since last October’s 8.90 percent. And percentage-point difference between the July annual decrease and June’s of 11.25 percent (1.56) was the biggest since producer prices strengthened by 0.36 percent on an annual basis in March, 2020, as the virus arrived in the United States in force, and then weakened by 1.44 percent in April (a 1.76 percentage point difference).

And once again, energy prices were the big driver.

In July, they jumped 27.59 percent year-on-year. But even that blazing pace was dwarfed by June’s 53.54 percent annual surge – the biggest on record (again, going back only to late 2009), and well ahead of the previous all-time high of 47.71 percent in April, 2021 (a figure strongly bolstered by the baseline effect, since in peak pandemic-y April, 2020, annual energy prices crashed by 30.20 percent.

The percentage-point gap between the June and July results were the widest ever, too – 25.95. The previous record was the 24.56 percentage point difference between that record 47.71 percent annual spurt increase in April, 2020 and the previous month’s rise of a relatively modest 23.15 percent. 

Since it doesn’t include energy prices, annual core PPI’s ups and downs – like those of monthly wholesale inflation – have been pretty tame in comparison.

The July increase of 5.75 percent was the best such performance since June, 2021’s 5.60 percent. And the annual rate of increase has now slowed for four straight months.

July’s annual core PPI rise was also an impressive 0.82 percentage points less than the June figure of 6.38 ercent. But that gap was only the biggest since May, 2020’s 0.62 percentage-point difference over the April results.

This relatively gradual drop in core PPI on a yearly basis (which RealityChek regulars know is a more reliable gauge of the trends in the monthly numbers because the longer timespan measured smooths out inevitably random short-term fluctuations) is the most compelling evidence that headline producer and consumer prices will remain worrisomely high for the foreseeable future.

This scenario isn’t inevitable. Maybe Americans can count on energy prices continuing to decline month-to-month long enough to bring annual inflation rates down in absolute terms. And maybe even they don’t, high energy prices won’t start boosting prices throughout the rest of the economy. But those developments can only be reasonably expected if consumer and business spending weakens enough to produce sluggish overall economic growth and even a recession.

Such a downturn is probably the price the nation has to pay to extinguish inflationary fires. The big problem is that, without a serious focus on reversing the long and possibly worsening U.S. slump in productivity growth, other than relief from the current cost of living crisis, the public – and especially the poorest Americans – probably won’t receive any major and solidly grounded living standards payoff from such a victory.

Making News: Back on National Radio on Biden and Supply Chain Security

Tags

Biden administration, CBS Eye on the World with John Batchelor, China, friend-shoring, Making News, national security, reshoring, supply chains

I’m pleased to announce that I’m scheduled to return tonight to “CBS Eye on the World with John Batchelor.” I don’t know yet exactly when the taped segment will be broadcast, but John’s show airs week night’s between 10 PM and midnight EST, he’s always worth tuning in. Tonight’s segment will ask whether the Biden administration’s “friend-shoring” strategy can actually make supply chains more reliable for a wide range of goods critical for U.S. national security and prosperity – and in particular reduce China’s place in them.

You can listen live at links like this one, and as always, if you can’t, I’ll post a link to the podcast as soon as it’s available.

And keep checking in with RealityChek for news of upcoming media appearances and other developments.

(What’s Left of) Our Economy: A Second Straight Month of Production Shrinkage for U.S. Manufacturing

Tags

aircraft, aircraft parts, apparel, appliances, automotive, CCP Virus, China, coronavirus, COVID 19, dollar, electrical components, electrical equipment, exchange rates, Federal Reserve, fiscal policy, inflation, inflation-adjusted growth, machinery, manufacturing, medical devices, medicines, metals, miscellaneous durable goods, monetary policy, personal protective equipment, petroleum and coal products, pharmaceuticals, production, real output, recession, semiconductor shortage, semiconductors, stimulus, supply chains, textiles, Trade Deficits, Wuhan virus, Zero Covid, {What's Left of) Our Economy

Yesterday’s after-inflation U.S. manufacturing production report (for June) marked a second straight decline in real output for domestic industry, adding to the evidence that this so far resilient sector is finally suffering the effects of the entire economy’s recent slowdown.

Another possible implication of the new downbeat results: The record and surging trade deficits being run in manufacturing lately may finally be starting undermine U.S.-based manufacturing’s growth. (See here for how and why.)

Also important to note: This release from the Federal Reserve incorporated the results of both typical monthly revisions but also its annual “benchmark” revision, which reexamined its data going back several years (in this case, to 2020), and updated the figures in light of any new findings.

And the combination has revealed some big surprises – notably that the domestic semiconductor industry, which along with its foreign competition has been struggling to keep up with recently booming worldwide demand, has turned out fully 36 percent less worth of microchips on a price-adjusted basis since the CCP Virus struck than was calculable from the (pre-revisions) May report.

In real terms, U.S.-based manufacturing shrank by 0.54 percent on month in June – the worst such result since last September’s 0.78 percent drop. Moreover, May’s originally reported 0.07 sequential percent dip is now judged to be a decrease of 0.52 percent.

The April results remained good, but were downgraded a second time, from 0.75 percent monthly growth in after inflation to 0.66 percent, while the March numbers told a similar story, with a third consecutive modest downward revision still leaving that month’s inflation-adjusted expansion at 0.76 percent.

Especially discouraging, though – the June report plus the two revisions left constant dollar U.S. manufacturing output just 2.98 percent greater than just before the pandemic struck the economy in full force and began distorting it, in February, 2020. The pre-benchmark revision May release pegged its virus-era real growth at a much higher 4.94 percent, and the first post-benchmark number was 4.12 percent.

May’s biggest manufacturing growth winners among the broadest manufacturing categories tracked by the Fed were:

>the very small apparel and leather goods industry. Its price-adjusted output surged by 2.54 percent month-to-month in June – its best such perfomance since May, 2021’s 2.63 percent. May’s initially reported 0.88 percent gain was revised down to a 0.34 percent loss, though. April’s upgraded 0.30 percent rise is now judged to be a 0.33 percent decrease, and March’s figures were revised down after two upgrades – from 1.54 to a still solid 1.30 percent. But whereas last month’s Fed release showed inflation-adjusted production in this sector up 4.59 percent during the pandemic era, this growth is now pegged at just 0.56 percent; 

>the miscellaneous durable goods sector, which contains the medical products like personal protective equipment looked to as major CCP Virus fighters. It’s June sequential output jump of 2.25 percent was its biggest since March, 2021’s 2.61 percent, and revisions were overall positive. May’s initially reported 0.96 percent monthly price-adjusted production gain was downgraded to 0.49 percent, but the April figure was revised up for a second time – to 0.71 percent – and March’s results were upgraded a third straight time, to 0.51 percent.

These industries are now 14.11 percent bigger in constant dollar terms than in February, 2020, versus the 11.41 percent gain calculable last month; and

>the electrical equipment, appliances, and components cluster, where price-adjusted production climbed 1.34 percent on a monthly basis in June, the strongest such showing since February’s 2.29 percent.. Revisions were positive on net, with May’s originally reported 1.83 percent monthly falloff downgraded to one of 2.35 percent, but April’s initially estimated -0.60 percent decrease upgraded a second time,to a 0.49 percent gain, and March’s three revisions resulting in an originally judged 1.03 percent increase now pegged at 1.23 percent. These results pushed these companies’ real production 5.59 percent higher than in immediately pre-pandemic-y February, 2020, not the 2.19 percent calculable last month;

The list of biggest manufacturing inflation-adjusted output losers for June was considerably longer, starting with

>printing and related support activities, where the monthly inflation-adjusted production loss of 2.16 percent was the worst such showing since February, 2021’s 2.26 percent. Revisions were actually net positive, with May’s initially reported dip of 0.35 percent upgraded to one of 0.15 percent; April’s results downgraded from a one percent advance to one of 0.33 percent after being revised up from an initially reported 0.49 percent; and March’s totals rising cumulatively from an initially reported 1.10 percent decrease to a decline of just 0.05 percent. All the same, the printing cluster is now judged to be 11.37 percent smaller in real terms than in February, 2020, not the 1.89 percent calculable last month;

>petroleum and coal products, whose June sequential production decrease of 1.92 percent was its biggest since January’s 2.96 percent. Revisions here were mixed, too, with May’s figure revised up from a 2.53 percent improvement to one of 2.61 percent; April’s totals downgraded a second time, from a 0.13 rise to one of 0.04 percent to a decrease of 1.91 percent; and March’s results increasing from an initial estimate of 0.72 percent to one of 1.03 percent. But whereas last month’s Fed release showed petroleum and coal products’ after-inflation output 1.21 percent above its last pre-pandemic level, this month’s reports that it’s 0.27 percent below.

>textiles and products, where price-adjusted output sank on month by 1.80 percent for its worst month since March’s 2.45 percent shrinkage. Revisions were negative, with May’s initially reported 0.02 percent real production decline downgraded to one of 0.35 percent, April’s upgraded 0.45 percent increase now pegged as a 0.05 percent decrease, and March’s initially reported 1.55 percent falloff now judged to be one of 2.45 percent. As a result, the sector is now 5.35 percent smaller in terms of constant dollar output, rather than down 3.80 percent as calculable last month; and

>primary metals, whose inflation-adjusted production sagged by 1.60 percent on month – its poorest performance since March’s 1.42 retreat. Revisions were overall positive here, with May’s initially reported 0.77 percent real output rise downgraded to one of 0.66 percent, April’s initially downgraded 1.22 percent increase revised up to 1.46 percent, and March’s initially reported 1.69 percent drop now judged to be that aforementioned 1.42 percent. Even so, primary metals price-adjusted production is now estimated as having inched up only 0.50 percent since the pandemic arrived, not the 4.45 percent increase calculable last month.

In addition, an unusually high three other major industry sectors suffered constant dollar output declines of more than one percent on month in June. On top of plastics and rubber products (1.25 percent), the were two that RealityChek has followed especially closely during the pandemic period – machinery and automotive.

As known by RealityChek regulars, the machinery industry is a bellwether for both the rest of manufacturing and the entire economy, since use of its products is so widespread. But in June, its real production was off by 1.14 percent on month, and May’s initially reported 2.14 percent decrease is now estimated at-3.14 percent – its worst figure since the 18.64 collapse recorded in pandemic-y April, 2020. And although this April’s numbers have been revised up twice, to have reached 2.20 percen, March’s initially reported 0.78 percent inflation-adjusted increase is now estimated to have been a 0.89 decrease. Consequently, in price-adjusted terms, the machinery sector is now estimated to be 4.70 percent larger than in February, 2020, not the 6.29 percent calculable last month.

As for motor vehicles and parts makers, dogged for months by that aforementioned semiconductor shortage, their real output was off by 1.49 percent on month in June, and May’s initially reported rise of 0.70 percent is now estimated as a1.86 percent decline. Following a slight downgrade, April’s output is now pegged as growing by 3.85 percent rather than 3.34 percent, and March’s initially reported 7.80 percent advance is now pegged at 9.08 percent – the best such total since last October’s 10.34 percent. Nonetheless, after-inflation automotive output is now reported to be 1.07 percent lower than just before the pandemic arrive in force, not the 1.17 percent higher calculable last month.

Notably, other industries that consistently have made headlines during the pandemic outperformed the rest of manufacturing in June.

Constant dollar output by aircraft- and aircraft parts-makers was up 0.26 percent month-to-month in June, but revisions were mixed. May’s initially reported 0.33 percent rise has now been downgraded to a 0.23 percent decline – snapping a four-month winning streak. April’s results were upgraded a second straight time – from a hugely upgraded 2.90 percent to an excellent 3.13 percent (the best such performance since January, 2021’s 8.60 percent burst). But the March figures have been substantially downgraded from an initially reported 2.31 percent to a gain of just 0.53 percent. After all this volatility, though, real aircaft and parts production is now 25.58 percent greater than in February, 2020, much better than the 19.08 percent calculable last month.

The big pharmaceuticals and medicines industry grew its real putput by another 0.39 percent in June, but revisions were generally negative. May’s initially reported 0.42 percent improvement, however, is now judged to be just an infinitesimal 0.01 percent. April’s upgraded 0.15 percent rise is now pegged as a 0.04 percent loss, and March’s results have been downgraded all the way from an initially reported 1.17 percent increase to one of just 0.49 percent. Price-adjusted output in these sectors, therefore, is now estimated at 12.98 percent higher than in February, 2020, versus the 14.64 percent calculable last month.

Medical equipment and supplies firms boosted their inflation-adjusted output for a sixth straight month in June, and by a stellar 3.12 percent – their best such performance since January’s 3.15 percent. May’s growth was downgraded from 1.44 percent to 1.01 percent, but April’s estimate rose again, from 0.51 percent to 1.01 percent, and March’s initially reported 1.81 percent improvement has been slightly downgraded to 1.67 percent. This progress pushed these companies’ real pandemic era output growth from the 11.51 percent calculable last month to 17.27 percent.

The news was significantly worse, though, in that shortage-plagued semiconductor industry. Real production rose by 0.18 percent sequentially in June, but May’s initially reported 0.52 percent advance is now judged to have been a 2.24 percent drop. Meanwhile, April’s already dreary initially reported 1.85 percent slump has now been downgraded again to one of 2.71 percent (the sector’s worst such performance since the 11.26 percent plunge in December, 2008 – in the middle of the Great Recession that followed the global financial crisis). Even March’s initially reported impressive 1.99 percent monthly price-adjusted production increase has been revised all the way down to 0.52 percent.

The bottom line: The pandemic-era semiconductor real production increase that was estimated at 23.82 percent last month is now judged to have been just 15.22 percent.

It’s not as if the recent official manufacturing data has been all disappointing. Employment, notably, rose respectably on month in June. And the pace of capital spending has actually sped up some (at least through May) – which, like employment is a sign of continued optimism among manufacturers about their future outlook.

But at this point, the headwinds look stronger – including continued credit tightening by the Federal Reserve (not to mention a drawdown in the massive bond purchases that also have significantly propped up the entire economy); the resulting downshifting in domestic economic growth at which the Fed is aiming in order to bring down raging inflation; an even worse slump in economies overseas, which have been important markets for U.S.-based industry; the strongest dollar in about two decades, which puts Made in America products at a price disadvantage the world over; and the ongoing supply chain snags resulting from the Ukraine-Russia War and China’s lockdowns-happy Zero Covid policy.

And don’t forget those stratospheric and still-rising manufacturing trade deficits, which could well mean that, once the unprecedented pandemic fiscal and monetary stimulus/virus relief that have helped create so much business for domestic industry starts fading significantly, U.S.-based manufacturers could might themselves further behind the eight-ball than ever.